Loaded-Gun.Com - Anti-Social.Com's Rejects!

General Category => Sex/Gossip => Topic started by: bagman on March 01, 2009, 11:19:08 PM

Title: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 01, 2009, 11:19:08 PM
Glad to fuckin' see you here!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 01, 2009, 11:21:17 PM
My dick's in the mashed potatoes.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 01, 2009, 11:22:59 PM
Post that old picture of her tits. I know one of you freaks have it saved on your hard drive. Probably is bagman's desktop too...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 01, 2009, 11:30:23 PM
Oh that underage one?  That pic is burned into my memory.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 01, 2009, 11:32:21 PM
In your spank bank?

I have it Tricky. But it's illegal.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 01, 2009, 11:36:42 PM
POST POST POST POST
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: The Geek on March 02, 2009, 10:18:32 AM
Danzig, can't you just take off your own shirt and get an idea of what it looked like?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 02, 2009, 12:36:05 PM
Hah, I have bigger tits than she ever will.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: mosh on March 02, 2009, 07:04:46 PM
Sooo, you're Ice T's missus?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: FAH-Q on March 02, 2009, 07:23:31 PM
Coco? She's like a black white girl.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 04, 2009, 01:20:12 AM
Again, happy birthday Sasha! It was great to see you. We definitely shouldn't wait another 4 years to hang again. Eitje, it was an absolute pleasure meeting you. Great choice on the beer.

But most importantly, Sasha, who the hell is that other Sasha? She wasn't at the bar, but showed up at the Drafthouse with the Asian gal, and my Lord she is so fucking cute. Dark hair, tats, petite. She works at Super Cuts or some other hair cutting place? Hahaha, hook a brother up!!!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: mosh on March 04, 2009, 04:09:20 AM
You aint ready for that...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 04, 2009, 08:04:06 AM
Well, happy birthday 13Chems.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 04, 2009, 08:30:52 AM
Eitje, it was an absolute pleasure meeting you.

Of course it was!  Everyone else said it would be.  :P

...who the hell is that other Sasha? ... my Lord she is so fucking cute.

Quick point of interest, and kind of an FYI:  you were not suave at all about trying to find out who she was while we were at the Alamo.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 04, 2009, 09:36:01 AM
So you're saying bagman is not suave? That he hasn't got any game? That his "lovestick" is almost rendered useless?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: SHUTUPSHUTUP on March 04, 2009, 09:53:33 AM
So you're saying bagman is not suave? That he hasn't got any game? That his "lovestick" is almost rendered useless?

have a nice warm cup of SHUT THE FUCK UP
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: krsna on March 04, 2009, 11:23:02 AM
Sahsa rules!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 04, 2009, 11:46:44 AM
Sahsa rules!

But is she good at sucking dick?  She looks like she could work a cock real good.  Do you swallow, Sasha?  If not I can always shoot it all over your face.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 04, 2009, 05:08:24 PM
Quote from: 13chemicals
If loving anal is wrong, I don't wanna be right
I'm assuming that's a 'yes', man ...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: 13chemicals on March 05, 2009, 01:05:07 AM
I swallow because I always forget to spit.  Oh and Kyle that other Sasha, lil' Sash, is a 19 I think and she is my new nemesis.  The first time I met her I almost beat her up but a bunch of people stopped me.  She came up to me and said, "meh, you're old Sasha."  I replied, "when's your curfew?," and she said, "pshaw you're just jealous because I'm so hot, I look like a model."  I thought, "wtf?" and pushed her on the ground as hard as I could and she screamed so I went to kick her and my friend Dave stopped me.  Oh well.  I don't think she's your type, unless you can duct tape her mouth closed.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 05, 2009, 01:32:32 AM
Post pics plz.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 05, 2009, 02:09:25 AM
... or just keep it full so she can't speak
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: underclass on March 05, 2009, 04:44:21 AM
agreed. and more of this younger hotter version thx
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 05, 2009, 09:33:56 AM
So you're saying bagman is not suave? That he hasn't got any game? That his "lovestick" is almost rendered useless?
I know, it's shockingly revelatory.

But he'd gone to do something before the movie started, and that's when new Sasha showed up to the movie.  As he was walking past her, his eyes were glued to her.  Then, when he sat down, he asked me who she was.  I didn't know, so he turned and asked the guy next to him who she was.  Then, at the end of the movie, he started asking OTHER people who she was.  Like, targetting her specifically.

I'm sure he's driving to multiple SuperCuts in town each day, just looking for her now.  He even knows that she normally gets off work at 8:30, giving himself 3 hours per day to hunt for her.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 05, 2009, 09:35:38 AM
Oh and Kyle that other Sasha, lil' Sash, is a 19 I think and she is my new nemesis.  The first time I met her I almost beat her up but a bunch of people stopped me.  She came up to me and said, "meh, you're old Sasha."  I replied, "when's your curfew?," and she said, "pshaw you're just jealous because I'm so hot, I look like a model."  I thought, "wtf?" and pushed her on the ground as hard as I could and she screamed so I went to kick her and my friend Dave stopped me.  Oh well.  I don't think she's your type, unless you can duct tape her mouth closed.
Ah, that makes me feel better then.  I introduced myself to her after the movie (for Kyle's sake, which he did not follow up on), and when she said that her name was Sasha, I told her "Oh, that's funny.  We lost one Sasha earlier, so they must have called in a replacement Sasha."

She was not amused, and actually not that happy to be talking to me.  Oh well.

Kyle cowered.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: krsna on March 05, 2009, 09:38:07 AM
LOL! From what I hear that's his normal MO.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Zoomie on March 05, 2009, 09:46:56 AM
That would totally screw his carbon footprint...

Hey dipshit, here's a clue: Yellowpages.com + celphone = inevitable rejection. But you'll try anyway.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 05, 2009, 09:47:23 AM
So let's see a picture already. This little minx sounds interesting. She enrages our Sasha, makes Kyle quail, and is disdainful of Lucas. And she's only 19? Come on, she's bound to have a facebook or myspace. You guys are all part of the same social network. Isn't she a friend of someone's friend or something?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 05, 2009, 09:50:54 AM
So let's see a picture already. This little minx sounds interesting. She enrages our Sasha, makes Kyle quail, and is disdainful of Lucas. And she's only 19? Come on, she's bound to have a facebook or myspace. You guys are all part of the same social network. Isn't she a friend of someone's friend or something?

She wasn't that great.  She was just small, which matched with Kyle's domination fantasies.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Zoomie on March 05, 2009, 10:54:07 AM
He likes... proportion...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 05, 2009, 12:30:16 PM
I love little chicks also mostly for reasons of domination fantasies and I used to cower before I realized that the best way to handle that was just not to give a shit about silly girls. Anyway, with my active imagination and pending any actual photos, I'm in your corner on this one Baggers. And she has tattoos. Aw'right.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: 13chemicals on March 05, 2009, 10:26:44 PM
This is her:
(http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/2/m_08a892028af64065a4d5058586e3a728.jpg)

I never said she was prettier than me.  She has braces, weighs 99lbs, and has no tits.  You could flip her over and pretend she was a twelve year old boy if you so wished.  Anyway, I talked to her today because Kyle wanted me to.  I thought she broke up with this guy, who is a lot like Kyle actually, but she didn't.  I think I may have convinced her to give you a shot, but she is still thinking about it.  I lied and told her you were a lawyer, young girls are gold diggers.  If you get a shot with her ROLL WITH THE LIE KYLE IT'S YOUR ONLY HOPE!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Zoomie on March 05, 2009, 10:31:28 PM
(http://www.fakeposters.com/uploads/428d4d389cfcf9b648cb8453afc5be79.jpg)
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 05, 2009, 10:40:53 PM
LIE KYLE IT'S YOUR ONLY HOPE!

I agree with this part. Also maybe tone down the jewish banker look? Wear some skinny jeans and a hoody with guns all over it, that's what those 19 hipster girls like.

p.s. Don't forget to smear some menstrual blood on your face before  your date with "S2", she'll probably think you're a vampire, young girls like vampires.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 05, 2009, 10:47:09 PM
I dig it. Can't quite make out what sort of a goofy face she's pulling but from this angle I say bagman's at least partially correct. She does look like fun.
And no, everyone knows Jewish bankers are lawyers. Stick to the plan. Nothing can possibly go wrong. Don't get all Kip and start throwing signs or anything. Just whisper some latin in her ear. Tell her she's your proximate cause.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Wozzeck on March 05, 2009, 10:56:09 PM
Quote
p.s. Don't forget to smear some menstrual blood on your face before  your date with "S2", she'll probably think you're a vampire, young girls like vampires.

Sasha already told the girl he was a lawyer.



(Sorry, Carolyn.)
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 06, 2009, 12:48:00 AM
Quote
Kyle cowered.

Oh wow, that's an insightful revelation and a real character divulgement; like saying that I'm white.

She has braces? Damn that's hot. I talked with her earlier and I'm taking her skinny ass to Cut Copy tomorrow night. Or maybe I dreamed that. Wet-dreamed that.

I like small girls, because I'm small. Don't most dudes like girls around their same size/shorter/smaller than them?

Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: underclass on March 06, 2009, 01:38:06 AM
You say that now, but you're yet to be slayed by a 6'2" athlete. Ah Sarah... how I miss your legs....
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 06, 2009, 01:41:02 AM
I talked with her earlier and I'm taking her skinny ass to Cut Copy tomorrow night. Or maybe I dreamed that. Wet-dreamed that.

Damn you rich Jewish lawyers! Always getting the pretty girls!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 06, 2009, 02:03:21 AM
I have a DVD, I believe it is Cum Dumpsters, where this hottie with braces begs the dude to cum on her braces.  It's pretty fuckin hot.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: mosh on March 06, 2009, 03:01:35 AM
This is her:
(http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/2/m_08a892028af64065a4d5058586e3a728.jpg)

Its a fuckin RealDoll.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 06, 2009, 03:04:53 AM
I am kyke to the bone. Except for my cock.

Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 06, 2009, 07:24:11 AM
Haha you are one of those guys that likes girls who are significantly younger than you. What, cant mentally handle someone closer to your age? Hahahahaha.

I can't imagine going out with someone nearly 10 years younger than me. The entire time we were hanging out I'd want to choke them, pobably.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Emperor Reagan on March 06, 2009, 08:30:25 AM
99 lbs?  I'd be terrified that she would look like a victim of domestic violence.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 06, 2009, 09:04:57 AM
99 lbs?  I'd be terrified that she would look like a victim of domestic violence.

She's very waifish.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 06, 2009, 09:20:40 AM
I think Sasha 1 is cuter, maybe because she doesn't look prepubescent.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: psychopathetic on March 06, 2009, 11:00:08 AM
I think Sasha 1 is cuter, maybe because she doesn't look prepubescent.

ding ding ding
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: underclass on March 06, 2009, 11:02:56 AM
bags, that chick friend of chemical's is rancid, don't touch that man....
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 06, 2009, 06:23:49 PM
The best part about fucking her, for me, would be hearing her bones crack ...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Zoomie on March 06, 2009, 07:34:48 PM
That's the best part of boning ANY chick.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 07, 2009, 02:57:10 AM
Watch and learn.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 07, 2009, 03:30:26 AM
Does this mean pics or videos?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 07, 2009, 04:28:21 AM
... videos of her man pounding him into the ground like a stake
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 07, 2009, 04:51:29 AM
I thought the word was that her man was another slight Jewish banker type. Maybe if his fury was great enough...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 07, 2009, 04:55:39 AM
SLAPFIGHT!!!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: underclass on March 07, 2009, 06:07:37 AM
somebody stop the silliness!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 07, 2009, 10:05:39 AM
I though bagman didn't go with Sasha 2 to the show? So what exactly are we watching and learning? His ability to fail miserably every single time??
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 07, 2009, 11:39:45 AM
I though bagman didn't go with Sasha 2 to the show? So what exactly are we watching and learning? His ability to fail miserably every single time??

You can't say it's every time, because he hasn't failed at least once (according to legend).
Of course, a friend of mine told me recently that dudes don't actually lose their virginity until the SECOND girl.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 07, 2009, 12:45:02 PM
Makes sense ....
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 07, 2009, 01:03:24 PM
Haha you are one of those guys that likes girls who are significantly younger than you. What, cant mentally handle someone closer to your age? Hahahahaha.

I can't imagine going out with someone nearly 10 years younger than me. The entire time we were hanging out I'd want to choke them, pobably.

I am not into her for stimulating conversation.
I am into her for stimulating my cock.

Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 07, 2009, 01:07:22 PM
Well did you see her at the show or not? I'm guessing no?

DENIED
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 07, 2009, 01:07:48 PM
I talked with her earlier and I'm taking her skinny ass to Cut Copy tomorrow night. Or maybe I dreamed that. Wet-dreamed that.
We're discussing Bagman's wet dream. And I for one feel dirty.

As for the virginity thing, that's certainly when I lost mine. With the first my thoughts were always "WTF just happened?" With the second my thoughts were always "OK Cool out. You've been here before." It was really only by the third one that I was like "And... Action!"  Funny how the first few were so memorable and then it starts to fade away until the point in your life where you realized quality was more important than quantity and when you remember those ones you have to go for the bottle.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: FAH-Q on March 07, 2009, 06:49:45 PM
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 07, 2009, 07:13:35 PM
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 07, 2009, 07:39:37 PM
The guy i was talking about in my "small cock" thread is 5'6"ish (same height as me). Therefore I now believe that all guys around my height have a tiny cock. His hands were also smaller than mine and his feet were about the size of mine too. Does short = small cock?? I hope that's not the case because I always see guys that are around my height that I think are attractive.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: mosh on March 07, 2009, 07:44:58 PM
Surely him having small hands would have been a bonus. He could have fisted you to the elbow, which could have made up for his other shortcomings.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 07, 2009, 07:47:57 PM
That's true but then he probably would've wanted to fuck at some point and his baby cock grossed me out.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 07, 2009, 08:05:06 PM
The guy i was talking about in my "small cock" thread is 5'6"ish (same height as me). Therefore I now believe that all guys around my height have a tiny cock. His hands were also smaller than mine and his feet were about the size of mine too. Does short = small cock?? I hope that's not the case because I always see guys that are around my height that I think are attractive.

Just like I now believe that all girls who hop on my cock will orgasm every time I pound them, as "J" has. Life is based on the experiences we have. I'm 5'7" and don't have a tiny cock. But I really want to see if the next girl acts the same way "J" does when we have sex. 2 - 0 and maybe I am really onto something...

Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: underclass on March 07, 2009, 09:56:12 PM
you're 5'7".... that makes your post about wanting to beat people up in the theater even better </cross reference>

A trip to Japan would set you right!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: psychopathetic on March 07, 2009, 11:00:08 PM
Just like I now believe that all girls who hop on my cock will orgasm every time I pound them, as "J" has. Life is based on the experiences we have. I'm 5'7" and don't have a tiny cock. But I really want to see if the next girl acts the same way "J" does when we have sex. 2 - 0 and maybe I am really onto something...



i don't understand why you're so sure all those orgasms are for reals. i don't know a single girl who hasn't faked it at least once. most girls have faked it a lot more than that. especially when they're screwing someone they're not in a relationship with. not to say it's not fun, anyway, because it obviously is if she's still doing it.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: mosh on March 07, 2009, 11:03:10 PM
I dont care about faked orgasms... I care about my dick getting wet.

If she blows great... if she dont, oh well, next time.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 07, 2009, 11:07:38 PM
i don't know a single girl who hasn't faked it at least once.

i have never faked it. i dont see the point. if a guy gets a bruised ego from my not getting off every single time, that's his own damn problem.

i nominate this thread be moved to sex forum.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 08, 2009, 01:18:48 AM
Psycho, of course that thought had always crossed my mind, but things all added up. Before she told me that I am the only guy who has ever made her cum while actually having sex (not via oral, manual) I sort of didn't believe her. We'd had sex probably 3 times before she came out and told me that. One of those times while she was hopping on top cowgirl style (this is the only position I have made her cum in so far), she whispered "How do you do that?". I didn't understand it at the time, but later I knew she meant how did I get her to cum while hitting her.  All that background is in the posts from Thrashinc.

Anyway, yes at breakfast one morning while we were eating she whispered that she loves fucking me on top because she cums every time. When I am having trouble blowing my load, she'll whisper "Just think about how you make me cum" or "Think about how you're the only guy who has ever made me cum during sex", etc.

And the tell-tale sign. The no-way-to-fake it, the reason I said "Mosh... funny story about that." in this thread: http://thrashinc.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?146486.40, is that she gushes. I wouldn't call it squirting because it doesn't spray out. But as she is hopping up and down and I add in some bonus thrusts from below for her, she gets excited and her breathing gets crazy, she starts snorting and then right as her pussy starts squeezing me and she moans loud enough to wake up all the neighbors, I get a sensation of warm wetness on my chest. She literally cums a stream out onto me as she is orgasming. I love the feeling of the warm, wet on me, and knowing that I am rocking her world.

Maybe it has to do with the fact that I am skinny. My pelvic bone is not covered with a lot of fat, skin, etc. So when I am banging her, my dick is inside rubbing all the right places, and her clit is smashing down on my pelvic bone, until she's in pure ecstasy.

Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 08, 2009, 01:19:31 AM
you're 5'7".... that makes your post about wanting to beat people up in the theater even better </cross reference>

A trip to Japan would set you right!

I want to come to Japan, just to feel like a complete GIANT.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 08, 2009, 05:18:23 AM
I'm 6'1", I'd love Japan ...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Libertine on March 08, 2009, 06:32:27 AM
The guy i was talking about in my "small cock" thread is 5'6"ish (same height as me). Therefore I now believe that all guys around my height have a tiny cock. His hands were also smaller than mine and his feet were about the size of mine too. Does short = small cock?? I hope that's not the case because I always see guys that are around my height that I think are attractive.

Yeah this logic can't be right because I'm 5'7" and I have a cock like a rhinoceros.  ???  I think your theory needs more practical study.

Honestly, I don't know or care how relatively large my dick is, I don't go around comparing it with other dudes.  It's always worked fine for me and I never leave a customer unsatisfied.

Brook, maybe you have an enormously deep vagina.  The cavernous depths of which a recent many gentleman have been unable to plumb successfully.

I'll put on a miner's helmet with a flashlight embedded in the cap and I will take a closer look to examine the circumstances.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: The Geek on March 08, 2009, 09:14:45 AM
Quote
I can't imagine going out with someone nearly 10 years younger than me. The entire time we were hanging out I'd want to choke them, pobably.

You ought to try 20 years old (and experienced).


Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 08, 2009, 10:50:17 AM
Cap- good to know. I will not dismiss guys that are around my height. I don't know if my pussy is cavernously deep or not. I haven't compared it to others. I guess I am just used to a certain size after fucking the same guy for 8 years.

Mello- Ya know, actually I retract my statement. I would casually date someone that young but I probably wouldn't be hanging out with them for their mind. Recently I did hang out with a 21 year old, it was fun.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: The Geek on March 08, 2009, 10:59:10 AM
Hanging out with them is OK as long as you can keep up. We are getting old and partying nightly isn't on our agendas (Something about hitting 25 and above )(and I'm above) means getting to bed early on weekdays... my 17 year old self would seriously punch my current self square in the face if she knew what she became... but I digress...

getting them in the bedroom is fun - as long as they are aware of what they are doing, and respect that YOU'RE the more experienced one, and should totally worship that.
They'll go all night and do everything possible to please you.
But DO NOT fall for them or try to date them. It's exhausting.

They make AMAZING friends, though!

Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: mosh on March 08, 2009, 11:02:41 AM
Yeah this logic can't be right because I'm 5'7" and I have a cock like a rhinoceros.  ??? 

It has a pointy horn on it's head? You should get that looked at.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 08, 2009, 11:31:19 AM
Yeah this logic can't be right because I'm 5'7" and I have a cock like a rhinoceros.  ??? 

Yeah I think cock-size is one of those variables that doesn't change much due to evolution. If smaller men could only be successful at breeding with with smaller women or not at all then we're talking about a speciation event. With the amount of mixing that occurs in human society, the pressure is to retain similar-sized Johnsons. What does this mean aesthetically? Big dudes look little and little dudes look like Tarzan. But then there's also the aesthetic pressures of sexual selection to contend with, and I'd think this would only have the effect of increasing the endowment-size of bigger dudes.

I'm not sure what was up with your little-dicked friend, Tricky, but I'm guessing:
A) Inbred - less pressure to keep up with the rest of the species, or
B) Paedomorphic mutant - a freak of nature, or
C) Immature member of the species - a child, you pedo.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 08, 2009, 01:55:09 PM
With the amount of mixing that occurs in human society, the pressure is to retain similar-sized Johnsons.

You're forgetting also that many cultures for many (MANY) hundreds of years had arranged marriages; it's only recently that personal choice is factoring into that decision at all.

So, for a long time, physical qualities were not the driving force behind breeding for humanity.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 08, 2009, 01:55:32 PM
... after fucking the same guy for 8 years.

How big was HE?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 08, 2009, 02:34:32 PM
With the amount of mixing that occurs in human society, the pressure is to retain similar-sized Johnsons.

You're forgetting also that many cultures for many (MANY) hundreds of years had arranged marriages; it's only recently that personal choice is factoring into that decision at all.

So, for a long time, physical qualities were not the driving force behind breeding for humanity.

many hundreds... psh... I'm talking about evolution not what you did last week.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Wozzeck on March 08, 2009, 02:54:45 PM
... no eitje, arranged marriage may have existed in some cultures, but even in those who you were married to did not always necessarily determine who you were producing children with.

So let's here from someone who has studied human evolution.

 Height (and not race) is the major factor in genital-size as far as averages go, but even then it doesn't produce any wild variation. We're talking something like one inch of length and a proportional increase girth per foot of height difference. So, yeah, a guy who is 5'6" should not by any means have something resembling a transplanted thumb between his legs. That dude just got a raw deal.

 Ladies, want to try your hands at being a size queen?* Look for guys who are abnormally tall, heavily muscled, narrow-hipped, with what appears to be disproportionately small cranial capacity, and of low intelligence. This still won't be any sort of guarantee, but the odds will be in your favor.

 Guys, want to find a girl who's blissfully tight?** Basically look for the exact opposite. You want a girl who's short, unusually intelligent, has a large head and high-brow, curvy hips, and lithe build. Same disclaimer applies as above.

As for dick-evolution,  human beings tend to mate for the long term, often for life***, while producing few young. The vast majority of the sex we have is for pleasure, and as such this has effected mate-selection as we became increasingly K-selective (producing fewer young with more investment in their development) as a species. The result: we have the largest dicks and the smallest balls, relative to body mass, of any primate.


*If you have a small penis, my condolences... but seriously, get over it. Fretting about that shit will not improve your attractiveness, now will it make you bigger. If a woman can get herself off with her finger, all is not lost.****

**Childbirth permanently alters the cervix. The. Cervix. Not the vagina. In some rare cases scarring of the vagina during labor will actually result in increased tightness.

***Those who argue based on primate behavior and sex drives that infidelity is a natural and therefore excusable occurrence are wankers. If sexual hedonism were a good thing for our species, we wouldn't form the intense bonds we do with our partners, nor would we feel the intense anguish at the betrayal of those bonds. Using the sort of arguments favored by those who support the acceptance of infidelity, you could also argue that it should be acceptable for men to commit murder, rape, infanticide, and genocide. All are quite normal amongst chimpanzees.

****Unless you have infantile penis syndrome. That just sucks.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Wozzeck on March 08, 2009, 03:22:20 PM
 Bagman, does she blush when she orgasms? Women do this when they fake it, because of the exertion of hyperventilating, squeezing muscles, etc. If the skin on her chest, face, even upper back blushes, she's faking it. So does it?

(In porno the girls wear a lot of body make-up for the lighting and cameras, this covers up the blushing, as well.)
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 08, 2009, 03:34:37 PM
So let's here from someone who has studied human evolution.
Dude. In your capacity as resident expert on evolution, WTF is up with sexual selection? It makes no sense to me. I picked up a few books by R.A. Fisher to help me out with this but I have yet to find the time to bore in. This gradschool shit is eating up everything.

Explain the peacock thing, plz.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 08, 2009, 05:42:09 PM
Bagman, does she blush when she orgasms? Women do this when they fake it, because of the exertion of hyperventilating, squeezing muscles, etc. If the skin on her chest, face, even upper back blushes, she's faking it. So does it?

(In porno the girls wear a lot of body make-up for the lighting and cameras, this covers up the blushing, as well.)

I don't think so, but I can't be positive because the lights are usually off and I usually have my eyes closed/half-closed. So is the liquid on my chest, piss, if she's faking it?  It doesn't smell like piss... and it evaporates fairly quickly. Honestly, I don't really like looking at her when we're having sex. Next time we go at it, I'll see if I can peek in when she goes to the bathroom to clean up and turns the bathroom light on.

I bet I could get her to orgasm the same way while doing her missionary style, except that my ass-cheeks burn out real fast from that thrusting. I need to work out my gluteus maximus. I go for about 20 in that position and then she's like "harder", "harder!" and my ass just can't handle it...

Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 08, 2009, 05:46:32 PM
So is the liquid on my chest, piss, if she's faking it?  It doesn't smell like piss... and it evaporates fairly quickly.
Sounds like alcohol or some solvent.
Is she a sentient fembot? Because that would be fucking cool.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: psychopathetic on March 08, 2009, 06:15:03 PM
Guys, want to find a girl who's blissfully tight?** Basically look for the exact opposite. You want a girl who's short, unusually intelligent, has a large head and high-brow, curvy hips, and lithe build. Same disclaimer applies as above.

neener neener.

hahaha! score one for me.

humility? what's that? :-*
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 08, 2009, 06:17:55 PM
^5
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Wozzeck on March 08, 2009, 06:18:50 PM
Okay, I admit it, I was deceiving you about the blushing to see if I could lure you into bullshitting us in turn.

It actually works the other way around, blushing = real orgasm. Most of the signals that a girl is orgasmic which are difficult (if not impossible) to fake are things you would pick up visually. So turn the lights on you fucking psuedo-Heeb.


Doormouse - I am by no means expert, but regardless of that what don't you get?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Zoomie on March 08, 2009, 06:38:34 PM
Uh... yeah.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 08, 2009, 08:02:09 PM
OK, I don't want to take up too much space here and the response I first wrote was mostly just me identifying problems and then coming up with solutions to them a few lines later (i.e. I was mainly just rambling). I think it's just really hard for me to accept evolution in a direction that is in any way harmful to the species. I can't get over the fact that the peacocks are polluting their own genetic pool with genes for this ridiculous plumage that has negative fitness consequences for them. I've reduced my ramble with most of my problems solved and unsolved to microprint below. Ultimately it boils down to my belief that the negative consequences of the retention of these genes to an N-2 generation should overwhelm any marginal benefit the species gains from speed and accuracy in female choice. You can blow it up and read all about it if you've nothing better to do. It's my problem, though, so if it's TL and you D want to R then that's cool too. I'd probably do the same.


TLDR Warning!

So the female selects the male with the fanciest gaudiest plumage.
This plumage takes a big toll on the male peacock in terms of energy needed to grow it as well as to haul it around with him. It slows him down and helps him get eaten by predators. Natural selection should kill this little trait off in only a few generations yet it persists. The reason is that the females select for it, but this is what I don't understand. Why would females select for a maladaptation?

The classic logic that everyone is taught in high school is that the males who have the fanciest plumage prove their healthiness to the females by having been able to survive so long with such a ridiculous display, so the females are all "Oh he's a vigorous young cock isn't he? Look at how he survives despite the odds! I'll take him." Well that seems pretty logical and I never really gave it much thought until later.

So my current problem is like this. First of all, it bothers me that we're anthropomorphizing so much in this little example when evolution is a blind and mute unconscious non-conscious force of nature. I prefer to simplify things by looking at just the operative evo forces in isolation and weighing them against each other.
With that in mind let's start from the proto-peacock - a shapeless blob - in a pre-sexual-selection environment. Discounting the possibility that the development of the silly plumage gene (SP) is a fitness-linked trait at this point, there is no force that would prompt its emergence except random mutation. I understand the need for sex as a means of variation so mutations would be a natural and good thing here. Well eventually one of these proto-peacocks from among the spectrum of proto-peacocks with differing degrees of fitness would begin to develop the SP phenotype. Chances are first SP carrier would be of average fitness, but let's really force the issue and imagine it was the healthiest of that generation which began to display SP traits. So that peacock - the first real peacock - would pass on the most offspring who are carriers and they would be genetically the finest peacocks and the line would continue until today. Now we have the high school explanation stripped of its anthropomorphic nature. But there's a kink that develops even at this early stage. If we look at the fitness potential of the male proto-peacock in pre-sex-selection times, it turns out that the first SP carrier can't be the peacock with the highest possible fitness because the SP trait is a negative one in terms of fitness in a pre-sex-selection age. The best the first real peacock can hope for is placement at second best or so. I suppose this could still enable it to become the dominant line after sex-selection begins because the SP carriers are certainly easily recognizable so the females may not be so fussy as to reject the second best in hopes of holding out for the best. OK let's assume that's the case. So that explains the peacock's emergence from the proto-peacock, although it really breezes over the portion about the start of sex-selection - I guess the theory is that with female choice the females should be able to quickly and immediately identify the fittest males so they don't end up waking up next to a disguised runt the next morning. Still kinda bothers me though. The more the SP trait is developed, the further from the peak of fitness they drive themselves. I suppose they only need to stay around the top so although what they've got now seems ridiculous to me it's nowhere near what they could produce if there were no negative consequences. So I guess the forces to increase size and decrease balance out around where we have it today. OK so from the male's perspective I guess I can kind of see it, although it still seems like a strange coincidence that there was no better and still visible trait that they could have developed like a single mammoth feather or a blazon of iridescence or something.

So let's examine the pros and cons from all relevant perspectives:
Female: Pro- it indicates membership in the upper echelons of fitness and it is so striking that we females immediately recognize its worth. We don't care about the males because all we need is their genetic material to pas on to have vigorous offspring.
Males: Con- We are constantly getting eaten by other animals despite our fitness. We only do it because the females force us.
N-2 Generation: Net Con - Female progeny unaffected, Male progeny highly likely to be SP carriers and thus healthy in body but unhealthy in adornment.

I see a net negative here. Granted there is no indication of the magnitude of these forces, so the benefits to the female may outweigh the benefits of all others, but my gut tells me the strongest force should be determined by the offspring who get a net negative by the retention of this nasty gene.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 08, 2009, 08:40:40 PM
With the amount of mixing that occurs in human society, the pressure is to retain similar-sized Johnsons.

You're forgetting also that many cultures for many (MANY) hundreds of years had arranged marriages; it's only recently that personal choice is factoring into that decision at all.

So, for a long time, physical qualities were not the driving force behind breeding for humanity.

many hundreds... psh... I'm talking about evolution not what you did last week.

if you're talking about human society (original quote), then you cannot ALSO be talking about evolution.  Human society has not existed long enough to have a measurable impact on evolution.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Libertine on March 08, 2009, 08:42:30 PM
The real answer is that females are attracted by the presence of flashy glorious blue plumes, nice eyes, whatever.  The females choose the genes which get passed on in this method and so these characteristics are more prevalent throughout subsequent generations.  These characteristics often attract more attention from predators, which controls for the potential extravagances of these evolutionary characteristics.  However, ideally as far as nature would be considered, a male would be visually impressive enough to attract the highest quality mate, pass on his genetics to be carried by her, and then get eaten by a predator.  Therefore I think the decor serves two purposes, it makes the male peacocks more attractive to both females and predators and this serves two overall goods: the quick proliferation of the genetics and then the subsequent quick removal of the male population, which serves no further purpose.

I think your mistake is to assume that the male population would somehow self-control to make themselves less preyed upon, which is a human instinct, when in fact I think that making males both more attractive to mates and predators is in fact a net gain for the natural balance in the whole.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 08, 2009, 09:46:09 PM
double sigh
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: underclass on March 09, 2009, 08:27:47 AM
(http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/fail-owned-motherly-fail.jpg)
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 09, 2009, 09:20:26 AM
That picture is obviously a WIN.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 09, 2009, 10:25:29 AM
So how bout those local sports teams?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: (_)_)===D on March 09, 2009, 10:37:05 AM
So how bout those local sports teams?

Ha ha, too late. We now know you and libertine have small dicks and are fags.

I'm gonna drink my Brawndo now and Mutilate my Thirst!

And I agree that that picture is a WIN I salute it with fists and yelling!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: (_)_)===D on March 09, 2009, 10:37:57 AM
Brawndo!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 09, 2009, 10:48:05 AM
Status quo restored. Yay for fists and yelling!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 09, 2009, 09:44:58 PM
I think the only way to settle this is for all the guys to post their height along with a picture of their cock with a ruler next to it.

DIX OR GTFO
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 09, 2009, 09:47:08 PM
I would, but I'm worried mine wouldn't fit within the frame...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 09, 2009, 09:47:35 PM
Self timer?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 09, 2009, 09:50:38 PM
I think the only way to settle this is for all the guys to post their height along with a picture of their cock with a ruler next to it.

I would, but Kyle would just save it, then whip it out several years from now, to embarass me.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 09, 2009, 10:00:18 PM
But think about all the joyful orgasms bagman will experience as he gets to masturbate over and over to your dick pic!

shudder
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 09, 2009, 10:02:09 PM
But think about all the joyful orgasms bagman will experience as he gets to masturbate over and over to your dick pic!

shudder

I don't want to assume that was a joyful orgasm shudder on your part, thinking about bagman (thinking about me).
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 09, 2009, 10:04:53 PM
No, that was disgust over thinking about what bagman does with all those various AS/ LG pictures he's saved over the years.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Zoomie on March 09, 2009, 10:06:12 PM
If you want to examine my cock, come to Beltaine, get naked and jump the bonfire with me.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 09, 2009, 10:07:45 PM
If you want to examine my cock, come to Beltaine and jump the bonfire with me.

Did I misunderstand, then, when you said that you would be completely naked (except for a torc) at the equinox celebration?

Or...  is that the same thing?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Zoomie on March 09, 2009, 10:11:37 PM
Torc and a loincloth. Though if it's chilly I will wear my wool cloak.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Emperor Reagan on March 09, 2009, 10:33:55 PM
I will be hiding in a tent with the irish whiskey.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 09, 2009, 10:41:22 PM
You, me, and C, probably. I don't really wanna see a bunch of naked drunken men running around.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: (_)_)===D on March 09, 2009, 10:43:10 PM
Here's what Zoomie could look like if he starts doing some 'roids!

(http://img.perezhilton.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/aabonaduce02__oPt.jpg)
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 09, 2009, 10:45:51 PM
I will be hiding in a tent with the irish whiskey.
You, me, and C, probably. I don't really wanna see a bunch of naked drunken men running around.

Psch.  There's better places to go @ Steeleye's beachhouse than a tent!
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 09, 2009, 10:52:30 PM
I still am not sure who or what Steeleye is. I'm trying to paint a mental picture of this whole thing and I am failing.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Doormouse on March 09, 2009, 11:02:19 PM
I always thought Steeleye was some kind of cheep beer or moonshine. The more the term came up the less likely it sounded, and now that I'm forced to confront the issue it makes no sense at all. I have no idea how I got that impression.

PS - Zoomie, did you shave for the roids picture?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 09, 2009, 11:23:38 PM
I still am not sure who or what Steeleye is.

Who.

I met him...  this past summer?  or the spring before....

He's one of the most interesting people I've ever met.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 10, 2009, 12:38:25 AM
Yeah, even I know that ...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 10, 2009, 04:04:33 AM
God damn you krsna, that last thing I wanted to know is that Danny Bonaduce's carpet match the drapes.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Zoomie on March 10, 2009, 06:35:13 AM
There will be no naked men unless you ask them to be naked.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: mosh on March 10, 2009, 06:45:15 AM
There will be no naked men unless you ask them to be naked.

The naked man works 2 out of 3 times.

I think the only way to settle this is for all the guys to post their height along with a picture of their cock with a ruler next to it.

I would, but Kyle would just save it, then whip it out several years from now, to embarass me.

That's a serious worry. It scares me that bagman would whip out other peoples cock at anytime.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Dixon Magina on March 10, 2009, 03:02:28 PM
why are there so many of you gays around here and how do i get bagman to whip out my cock too?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 10, 2009, 05:25:19 PM
Uhm, ask him?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: 13chemicals on March 13, 2009, 05:58:13 PM
So Kyle, did you go out with lil' Sash?  Oh and that other chick said that she cums with you everytime so that you'll continue to fuck her.  She's a fat girl remember?  They have to tell tall tales like that so you'll keep coming back around.  PS-  You and Luke need to come to the bbq Saturday!  What's your number?
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: mosh on March 13, 2009, 06:21:50 PM
Wish I could go to the BBQ Saturday...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 13, 2009, 06:43:02 PM
Oddly enough, me too ...
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 14, 2009, 10:57:44 PM
Fuck! I haven't gotten on here since last weekend. Where's the party at? It's only 10 -- should be raging for at least another 4 hours, right?? SASHA! Gimme the address.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 14, 2009, 11:43:06 PM
Party cancelled due to lack of interest.

Instead, Sash and I are going to see a movie tomorrow.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: bagman on March 15, 2009, 12:20:56 AM
Party cancelled due to lack of interest.

Instead, Sash and I are going to see a movie tomorrow.

Which Sash? *evil eye*
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 15, 2009, 09:41:45 AM
I don't care about your little crush.  Why would I do something with her?

Besides, you've only ever seen her once, so you can hardly call dibs, and you still haven't answered questions about what happened to the "date" you were supposed to go on with Mini-Sash.
So keep that evil eye to yourself.  :P
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Drugmoth on March 15, 2009, 10:10:52 AM
I'll give Snaush the brown eye.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 15, 2009, 05:46:33 PM
Update:  Movie was good; no anal sex.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 15, 2009, 09:25:05 PM
I'll give Snaush the brown eye.

You'll give her your brown eye? How romantic.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 15, 2009, 10:00:09 PM
I'll give Snaush the brown eye.

You'll give her your brown eye? How romantic.

Yeah, when I first read that, I thought "I don't think he said what he means."

Because, I mean, after all (http://loaded-gun.com/index.php?topic=31.msg4286#msg4286)....
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: tricky on March 15, 2009, 10:18:35 PM
For the love of all that is holy, don't ever Google image search "anal herpes". Or do, whatever. Just make sure safe search is off.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: taiko on March 15, 2009, 10:22:23 PM
whew.

I should have listened to you.
Title: Re: Sasha!!
Post by: Thrash on March 15, 2009, 11:58:40 PM
Live and learn ....