Loaded-Gun.Com - Anti-Social.Com's Rejects!

General Category => Discontempt => Topic started by: Zoomie on March 27, 2009, 01:22:51 PM

Title: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on March 27, 2009, 01:22:51 PM
Some of you are either being dickheads, are ignorant, stupid, or all of the above. So I'll show you the difference.

This is LARP. Fantasy nerds in costume.
(http://www.mmonotebook.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/larp.jpg)

Someone reads a story while they act it out.(http://www.originsgamefair.com/uploads/yG/Rz/yGRz04Xg8OD_p51L25_1EA/Boffa_Larp_dv.jpg)


This is SCA. Real people, real armor, real pain, even with armor on. No foam swords.
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y85/Zoomie/DSCF0337.jpg)
Would a foam LARP sword scar that shield like that?

Sieges are pandemonium. No script.
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y85/Zoomie/DSCF0338-1.jpg)
The long sticks in the back are 2" rattan with a rubber head. You take a spear thrust to the head, even with a 14ga steel helm on, you're going out for a few seconds and waking up with 5 guys stepping on your guts. Fun!

No more questions, just STFU.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on March 27, 2009, 01:27:57 PM
Dude, roll 10d20 and calm down. Why would even give a shit about what us goofballs think?

Besides, we're allowed to bust your balls any way we want.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on March 27, 2009, 01:29:31 PM
No you aren't.

I'm not upset. It just seemed that some people didn't know the difference.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on March 27, 2009, 01:37:16 PM
On a somewhat related note, there's a very large Brunswick Zone near where I used to live. Nick and Mello have both been there bowling with me for moonlight bowling and it's always a blast.

So anyway, on Wednesday nights there's some LARP group that meets there and hangs out in the fireplace lounge by the bar. As near as I can tell it's like some post-apocalyptic / elizibethian vampire thing. Nobody runs around shrieking lightening bolt or anything like that. They mostly mill around in groups of three or four staring each other down and looking like they're plotting against one another. Lame.

Really, I just think it's an excuse for the fat chicks to dress like sluts and get their asses kissed by the uber-nerds who are trying to one up each other with their pseudo mad max costumes.

So what I REALLY want to do is to orchestrate and video tape a little mind fuck. Imagine this scene...

The LARP freaks are staring each other down and trying to get laid when from out of nowhere about a dozen pirates walk in and start harassing them. Then, a bunch of ninja appear from out of nowhere and a battle ensues.

THEN, Chuck Norris appears, and the ninjas and pirates flee in terror. Chuck then strides off into the sunset.

That would be awesome.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: psychopathetic on March 27, 2009, 02:16:51 PM
i was really hoping there would be ninjas in that story.

i think maybe chuck norris should be in full walker, texas ranger gear, though. just so you can round the whole thing out with cowboy.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on March 27, 2009, 02:24:40 PM
Yeah, I agree. I was originally thinking karate pants wearing Norris, but a couple of weeks ago I came to the conclusion that Walker Norris would be the shit.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on March 27, 2009, 05:35:49 PM
D+D, anyone?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: ttfg on March 27, 2009, 05:46:25 PM
I played laserforce back in '91.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on March 27, 2009, 05:47:23 PM
Wan't there another one called, like, "Lords Of Creation" or something like that?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Libertine on March 27, 2009, 06:35:15 PM
SCA looks pretty hardcore.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on March 27, 2009, 06:37:03 PM
So, the SCA LOLS at LARP?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: underclass on March 27, 2009, 08:31:44 PM
Honest question: Do you speak in character in these events?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on March 27, 2009, 09:49:42 PM
In all honesty, it looks just as gay as larping, and any other adult pretend dress-up games.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on March 27, 2009, 09:58:44 PM
But wearing corpse paint and wearing homo-erotic leather outfits covered in nails and pretending that you kill people is totally cool though, right?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on March 27, 2009, 09:59:16 PM
Yeah... totally.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: tricky on March 27, 2009, 10:33:00 PM
In all honesty, it looks just as gay as larping, and any other adult pretend dress-up games.

What about teacher and naughty schoolgirl? Priest and nun? Those are fun I'd imagine. You idiot.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on March 27, 2009, 10:39:09 PM
But wearing corpse paint and wearing homo-erotic leather outfits covered in nails and pretending that you kill people is totally cool though, right?

No, actually, it's the same.  I just like the music.  I think dress up is ghey, be it LARPing or BM.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on March 27, 2009, 10:39:53 PM
In all honesty, it looks just as gay as larping, and any other adult pretend dress-up games.

What about teacher and naughty schoolgirl? Priest and nun? Those are fun I'd imagine. You idiot.

Ok that's WAY different. 
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Libertine on March 28, 2009, 12:53:58 AM
In all honesty, it looks just as gay as larping, and any other adult pretend dress-up games.

What about teacher and naughty schoolgirl? Priest and nun? Those are fun I'd imagine. You idiot.

Ok that's WAY different. 

Nice backtrack.

It says a lot about a society that our natural human blood lust is sublimated into activities as hilarious as this when in actuality we should just be rampaging around unchecked decapitating our enemies and thus dually solving the problem of global overpopulation and resource scarcity.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: katie on March 28, 2009, 12:56:35 AM
But wearing corpse paint and wearing homo-erotic leather outfits covered in nails and pretending that you kill people is totally cool though, right?

i wouldn't ever want to stop talking to you.

what the fuck, am i on ecstasy or something? so emo today.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on March 28, 2009, 12:58:15 AM
In all honesty, it looks just as gay as larping, and any other adult pretend dress-up games.

What about teacher and naughty schoolgirl? Priest and nun? Those are fun I'd imagine. You idiot.

Ok that's WAY different. 

Nice backtrack.

It says a lot about a society that our natural human blood lust is sublimated into activities as hilarious as this when in actuality we should just be rampaging around unchecked decapitating our enemies and thus dually solving the problem of global overpopulation and resource scarcity.

.......what?  Talk smaller.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: katie on March 28, 2009, 01:03:27 AM
i've got it.

while attempting to dose me with rohypnol, somebody accidentally slipped me an ecstasy in my sex on the beach.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Libertine on March 28, 2009, 01:09:19 AM
1) I think that people are inherently violent and destructive.
2) Modern society has curbed this tendency in us to the extreme.

3) What results is stuff like Live Action Roleplay and whatever SCA stands for, people cannot turn off their violent and competitive natures so they channel them into other activities like pretending to be knights and punching each other with rubber mallets -or- dressing up in black/gold and white/purple and hitting each other for 60 minutes while chasing a tightly wound leather ball.  To each their own.

4) These modern ways of artificially sublimating human aggression are preventing natural human conflict and so large populations continue to grow unchecked until eventually there is not enough left for any of us.

Also I've spent too many thousands of hours reading about human history and social/government policy and my view of the world is pretty cynical.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: psychopathetic on March 28, 2009, 01:13:50 AM
1) I think that people are inherently violent and destructive.
2) Modern society has curbed this tendency in us to the extreme.

3) What results is stuff like Live Action Roleplay and whatever SCA stands for, people cannot turn off their violent and competitive natures so they channel them into other activities like pretending to be knights and punching each other with rubber mallets -or- dressing up in black/gold and white/purple and hitting each other for 60 minutes while chasing a tightly wound leather ball.  To each their own.

4) These modern ways of artificially sublimating human aggression are preventing natural human conflict and so large populations continue to grow unchecked until eventually there is not enough left for any of us.

Also I've spent too many thousands of hours reading about human history and social/government policy and my view of the world is pretty cynical.

talk less smarter
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Libertine on March 28, 2009, 01:27:35 AM
talk less smarter

Cavemen bashed each others heads in with rocks.

10000 years later.

Modern human beings are no different, except their desire to bash each others skulls in are repressed by the societies in which they live.

Thus, they engage in retarded activities like fantasy role playing, football, and counterstrike -- in order to stimulate their primal desire for violence in lieu of the real thing which is no longer socially acceptable.

But violence and war have always served a purpose, because human beings in themselves are not valuable at all to earth, and their natural ability to decimate one another has for several thousand years been an excellent check on overburdening their environments.  Remove that check and they devastate their own habitat.  Humans are the top of the food chain and they are their own only predator.  Without allowing them to predate one another humans just replicate en masse until everyone is starving, or the lands they needed for the growing of food are ravaged by over-use.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on March 28, 2009, 01:29:38 AM
1) I think that people are inherently violent and destructive.
2) Modern society has curbed this tendency in us to the extreme.

3) What results is stuff like Live Action Roleplay and whatever SCA stands for, people cannot turn off their violent and competitive natures so they channel them into other activities like pretending to be knights and punching each other with rubber mallets -or- dressing up in black/gold and white/purple and hitting each other for 60 minutes while chasing a tightly wound leather ball.  To each their own.

4) These modern ways of artificially sublimating human aggression are preventing natural human conflict and so large populations continue to grow unchecked until eventually there is not enough left for any of us.

Also I've spent too many thousands of hours reading about human history and social/government policy and my view of the world is pretty cynical.

talk less smarter

Yeah that!!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: bagman on March 28, 2009, 03:04:20 AM
Difference?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Tru on March 28, 2009, 03:59:53 AM
>>But wearing corpse paint and wearing homo-erotic leather outfits covered in nails and pretending that you kill people is totally cool though, right?<<

Damn Straight !

Actually this is only an expression of the sports mentality most people seem to be laboring under.
But at least in this context the people who would otherwise be positioned in front of every TV game imaginable actually get the fuck out and conflict with each other. It's a more healthy outlet imo.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on March 29, 2009, 02:11:12 PM
i've got it.

while attempting to dose me with rohypnol, somebody accidentally slipped me an ecstasy in my sex on the beach.

Ok, so we're back to anal again; bonus ...

In all honesty, it looks just as gay as larping, and any other adult pretend dress-up games.

Why can't I take this seriously coming from YOU?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Phaedrus on March 29, 2009, 02:53:33 PM
LARP: A bunch of sad losers dress up like people from a thousand years ago to pretend that they're ignorant, smelly jackasses living in an escapist fantasy world without electricity or plumbing that they wouldn't survive for five seconds in if they were actually there.

SCA: A bunch of sad losers dress up like people from a thousand years ago to pretend that they're ignorant, smelly jackasses living in an escapist fantasy world without electricity or plumbing that they wouldn't survive for five seconds in if they were actually there.

I see no difference between the two, really.  Except the SCA guys probably whine a lot more when something's inaccurate or someone accidentally gets hurt.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on March 29, 2009, 04:29:31 PM
LARP: A bunch of sad losers dress up like people from a thousand years ago to pretend that they're ignorant, smelly jackasses living in an escapist fantasy world without electricity or plumbing that they wouldn't survive for five seconds in if they were actually there.

SCA: A bunch of sad losers dress up like people from a thousand years ago to pretend that they're ignorant, smelly jackasses living in an escapist fantasy world without electricity or plumbing that they wouldn't survive for five seconds in if they were actually there.

I see no difference between the two, really.  Except the SCA guys probably whine a lot more when something's inaccurate or someone accidentally gets hurt.

I'm not gonna put that in the quoebox, however, it was worth quoting ...
hahahaha ...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: taiko on March 31, 2009, 10:02:10 AM
talk less smarter

folks like violence, and will do what it takes to see it/be it.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Doormouse on March 31, 2009, 11:18:02 AM
You're forgetting about intelligent violence, lucas.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on March 31, 2009, 06:29:42 PM
"'scuse me, do you have any Grey Poupon?"
"No."
*BitchSlap!*
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: pepper on March 31, 2009, 08:02:26 PM
In my freshman year of high school there was a popular teacher who got kids all into learning by making it more real for them. This year he was teaching Classical history, and he decided that the students would better understand the importance of the Roman phalanx if the students trained to fight as one. So, after they had been training for some months, he recruited a bunch of students including myself to do battle as barbarians against the Roman phalanx in a test of their military superiority.

Our weapons were restricted to cardboard and duct tape, but we managed to find lots of reinforced cardboard tubes and such like to use as swords and spears. On the day of the battle, I armed myself with a big long spear tube with a cardboard spike at the end of it. As the phalanx began marching across the field towards us, I bellowed out my war cry and led the charge towards those dastardly Romans. Instead of trying to find a weakness in their shields, I just used my size and strength to smash through the wall of shields and break up their unit. I was of course immediately ruled a casualty and had to sit the rest of the round out, but after rupturing their defenses, my fellow barbarians were able to mop the Romans up without too much trouble.

The moral of the story? Berzerkers are way more awesome than Hoplites.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: FAH-Q on March 31, 2009, 08:10:30 PM
Berserker (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-QujGxLc3E&feature=related#lq-hq)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Wozzeck on March 31, 2009, 08:10:50 PM
 I think the moral of the story is that you and/or your teacher suck at classical history.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Libertine on March 31, 2009, 08:25:52 PM
The Moral of the Story as usual with the Roman military is that when they contract out the barbarian slaying duties to inexperienced mercenaries they get moped up.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Emperor Reagan on March 31, 2009, 11:09:12 PM
LARP: A bunch of sad losers dress up like people from a thousand years ago to pretend that they're ignorant, smelly jackasses living in an escapist fantasy world without electricity or plumbing that they wouldn't survive for five seconds in if they were actually there.

SCA: A bunch of sad losers dress up like people from a thousand years ago to pretend that they're ignorant, smelly jackasses living in an escapist fantasy world without electricity or plumbing that they wouldn't survive for five seconds in if they were actually there.

I see no difference between the two, really.  Except the SCA guys probably whine a lot more when something's inaccurate or someone accidentally gets hurt.

Escapism?

The two most common escapist phenomena in the western world these days are TV & the internet.

Deriding someone else's activities as escapism when we're all sitting around spewing bullshit on the internet is the ol' casting stones from a glass house sort of move.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Doormouse on March 31, 2009, 11:21:09 PM
I'll punch you with words, Emp!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: taiko on April 01, 2009, 12:30:22 AM
I'll punch you with words, Emp!

Intelligent Violence!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 01, 2009, 12:36:20 AM
I'll punch you with words, Emp!

Intelligent Violence!

Mind jabs! Cerebral strikes! Brain blows!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 01, 2009, 03:02:16 AM
Vercingetorix was a pussy.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 01, 2009, 03:18:41 AM
Asterix was indomitable though!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 01, 2009, 07:35:31 AM
So sad that SOME OF you can't adequately attack me so you attack my hobbies and my heroes. Extremely lame. Especially the fat one in east TX who is so sad he can't go out.

Waiting with great anticipation for the news story where they have to cut out the front wall of his house and transport him to hospital with a crane. With a stop at the zoo to weigh him. I love stories like that.

I also like to hear true stories of addicts who OD in back alleys and how they got there as told through the tears of a loved one. And the dramatic dynamics of bands no one ever heard of and no one will until 20 years after their breakup when their sole surviving piece of vinyl shows up at a Goodwill store in Kalamazoo.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 01, 2009, 08:16:02 AM
Hey, dont take me running (badly) with your fleshlight.com yurt joke as an attack... your hobbies and heroes have never been attack fodder for me.

Since you explained it to me, I just look at as that's what Aaron does.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: taiko on April 01, 2009, 08:56:20 AM
Since you explained it to me, I just look at as that's what Aaron does.

Sort of like travelling around the world every two years.

I mean, who's fucked up enough to want to do something like that??
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 01, 2009, 10:50:10 AM
So sad that you can't adequately attack me so you attack my hobbies and my heroes. Extremely lame. Especially the fat one in east TX who is so sad he can't go out.

Waiting with great anticipation for the news story where they have to cut out the front wall of his house and transport him to hospital with a crane. With a stop at the zoo to weigh him. I love stories like that.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 01, 2009, 10:53:24 AM
I think it would be fun to armor up and go brawl.

As a matter of fact, I sometimes get my children to put on face masks and chest plates and have them go at it. They love it.

Except for the one day I was teaching my son the double leg take down and his sister fell on his face knee first. Now he's always like, "I don't want to do the double leg".
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 01, 2009, 02:14:51 PM
I'll punch you with words, Emp!

Yeah, call him out properly:
Http://www.Flame4Cash.Com (http://Http://www.Flame4Cash.Com)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 01, 2009, 03:12:47 PM
Jesus, someone slipped off their hemorrhoid pillow this morning.

Also, how the fuck am I supposed to know Verginetorix is your hero? Mind bullets? That's like me saying "HOW DARE YOU BESMIRCH THE NAME OF LESLIE MOONVES? HE'S A PERSONAL HERO OF MINE!"

Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: FAH-Q on April 01, 2009, 03:18:27 PM
I'll punch you with words, Emp!

Intelligent Violence!

Mind jabs! Cerebral strikes! Brain blows!

LOUD NOISES!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Phaedrus on April 01, 2009, 03:20:09 PM
So sad that SOME OF you can't adequately attack me so you attack my hobbies and my heroes. Extremely lame. Especially the fat one in east TX who is so sad he can't go out.

Waiting with great anticipation for the news story where they have to cut out the front wall of his house and transport him to hospital with a crane. With a stop at the zoo to weigh him. I love stories like that.

Haha it's sad that I make fun of a LARP fag (Oh sorry SCA) who goes apeshit and cells me names when I say I don't like his favorite comic book movie or his friend's computer company, but right after that you make jokes about my imminent death while I'm on borrowed time as it is?  If death was something I was actually afraid of, I dare say I might be offended.

And I'm the asshole?  I love the self-centered unilateral view of the world that you have.  Hell, I envy it.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: tricky on April 01, 2009, 03:26:38 PM
This thread was lame to me at first, but now it's getting kind of cool!

Carry on.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 01, 2009, 03:30:17 PM
It's only an insult if it isn't true, Johnny.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 01, 2009, 03:34:33 PM
Lothar, we must be getting old. You and I traded better ones when you'd been on the road for a month and I'd drunk so much I couldn't see to type.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Phaedrus on April 01, 2009, 03:38:01 PM
No, I do believe that creating elaborate stories as to the methods of removing my bloated corpse would be considered a darkly funny insult.  What, are you Dave now?  Is this "tough love"?  Are you going to pretend that you're doing something "good" now?  Little late for that.  That doorway's already been cut.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 01, 2009, 05:09:25 PM
Lothar, we must be getting old. You and I traded better ones when you'd been on the road for a month and I'd drunk so much I couldn't see to type.

Sigh, the truth sucks.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Wozzeck on April 01, 2009, 05:43:10 PM
The truth sucks when you suck.


Krsna - Awesome fathering! You should look into the ARMA (Association of Renaissance Martial Arts). Kids need fucking hobbies.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 01, 2009, 07:39:30 PM
The truth sucks when you suck.

A few more jabs like that and you'll be saying hey to some of my friends in the cornbread mafia.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: taiko on April 01, 2009, 09:09:32 PM
SCA man, SCA man
SCA man hates East Texas man
They have a fight, SCA wins
SCA man
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 01, 2009, 09:12:30 PM
I also like to hear true stories of addicts who OD in back alleys and how they got there as told through the tears of a loved one.

Is that one me??  :D
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 01, 2009, 09:13:31 PM
Like you didn't already know that my porky little love muffin...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 01, 2009, 09:29:41 PM
Stop it Zooms, yer makin' me blush.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Phaedrus on April 01, 2009, 11:18:29 PM
SCA man, SCA man
SCA man hates East Texas man
They have a fight, SCA wins
SCA man

You know, I've always wanted to ask you... what does Zoomie's dick taste like?  Are those pom poms heavy?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 01, 2009, 11:24:09 PM
Don't you remember?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: taiko on April 01, 2009, 11:24:39 PM
Probably tastes like boot leather.

Listen, if you want to be mad at someone, get pissed at "They Might Be Giants".
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Phaedrus on April 01, 2009, 11:34:37 PM
I'm not mad at anyone.

Why, am I hitting a little too close to the mark?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 02, 2009, 05:08:52 AM
Since you explained it to me, I just look at as that's what Aaron does.

Sort of like travelling around the world every two years.

I mean, who's fucked up enough to want to do something like that??

It'd be more often if I could afford the time...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 02, 2009, 05:12:20 AM
Listen, if you want to be mad at someone, get pissed at "They Might Be Giants".
You are an evil, evil man. What'd TMBG ever do to you?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 02, 2009, 05:20:29 AM
They Might Be Overrated
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 02, 2009, 09:53:17 AM
Danzig, as soon as you start doing something with your life instead of trying to steal your own medication out of your father's safe we'll listen to your musical critiques. Calling They Might Be Giants over rated is like calling Tiny Tim over rated.

Balor,  ;D. They have a lot of fun. I'd forgotten about ARMA. I like how seriously they take everything. At the moment however, I'm just teaching my kids unarmed combat. Sometimes I give them an Escrima stick and set them loose on the trees. They think it's the best time ever.

Fuse, aren't you the one who came into this thread and started giving Zoomie a hard time? Why then when he barks back are you trying to pull some guilt trip shit, what kind of pussy bullshit is that? Like we all know you're getting ready to kick the bucket. If it's just from being a fattie tell your family to go fuck themselves for not pitching in to get you bariatric surgery. I guess they don't care about you enough to keep you kickin.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 02, 2009, 10:39:30 AM
Fuse, aren't you the one who came into this thread and started giving Zoomie a hard time? Why then when he barks back are you trying to pull some guilt trip shit, what kind of pussy bullshit is that? Like we all know you're getting ready to kick the bucket. If it's just from being a fattie tell your family to go fuck themselves for not pitching in to get you bariatric surgery. I guess they don't care about you enough to keep you kickin.

Aww leave him alone, he didn't INVENT the twinkie...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Wozzeck on April 02, 2009, 11:21:59 AM
 I don't remember if they were ARMA or a different WMA group, but there was a pretty good looking training group that runs outside of Philly with another location I think in Maryland. I love that WMA are being reconstructed, because of the cultural connection, that they never suffered the sporterizing Eastern fighting systems have, and the training progression of unarmed -> dagger -> sword/sword and buckler -> longsword -> polearms, where each step builds fundamental skills for the following ones.

 The illustrations from the old fechtbooks show clearly how no-nonsense the European fighting systems were.

 What I'd really like to see is a modernized branch-off, though, replacing sword/sword and buckler with a cane and improvised defense (such as a coat or jacket draped over the off-hand), and unifying the longsword/polearm fighting into the use of a 4 or 5 foot staff, which would better develop skills transferable to modern improvised weapons. (French stick-fighting did this to some extent, using a 4 foot stick with techniques transferred from those used with the longsword.)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 02, 2009, 12:04:27 PM
Anything looks good in theory, but without actual investigation and testing you end up with a lot of shit. That's what happened to Eastern martial arts, and the teachers just said if you can't get a technique to work in actual combat then you need to practice harder not that the technique was far fetched.

MMA has done a great job of seperating the wheat from the chaff in unarmed combat. It's not survival fighting, but you're not ALWAYS going to have the opportunity to gouge your opponents eyes out, and I'm not entirely sure that savagely biting someone's cheek, nose or fingers off is going to stop an opponent who's only intent is murdering you. A broken arm or inability to breathe however, will severly hamper their efforts.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 02, 2009, 02:14:15 PM
Bas Rutten Street Defense - The Better Version (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3K-mrlYG7Y#lq2-hq)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Phaedrus on April 02, 2009, 04:52:30 PM
Fuse, aren't you the one who came into this thread and started giving Zoomie a hard time? Why then when he barks back are you trying to pull some guilt trip shit, what kind of pussy bullshit is that? Like we all know you're getting ready to kick the bucket. If it's just from being a fattie tell your family to go fuck themselves for not pitching in to get you bariatric surgery. I guess they don't care about you enough to keep you kickin.

Well, I'm trying to communicate something here, but I suppose it's getting lost in the translation.  Something about visual acuity and foliage and whatnot.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Emperor Reagan on April 02, 2009, 07:10:34 PM
Anything looks good in theory, but without actual investigation and testing you end up with a lot of shit. That's what happened to Eastern martial arts, and the teachers just said if you can't get a technique to work in actual combat then you need to practice harder not that the technique was far fetched.

MMA has done a great job of seperating the wheat from the chaff in unarmed combat. It's not survival fighting, but you're not ALWAYS going to have the opportunity to gouge your opponents eyes out, and I'm not entirely sure that savagely biting someone's cheek, nose or fingers off is going to stop an opponent who's only intent is murdering you. A broken arm or inability to breathe however, will severly hamper their efforts.

Krav Maga purported to teach survival techniques, though they almost exclusively were...knee to the balls, throw a bunch of punches, and run.  Those classes got pretty boring pretty quick.

I like the MMA-style gym I'm at now a lot better than anything else I've ever done.  I don't know if the difference is so much that they seperate the wheat from the chaff, though. I'd say that the difference is in MMA classes you have more leeway to build personal skill set, while in a traditional martial arts class, you're building a generic skill set.  In an MMA style gym you're competing from day one - 25-50% of every class is actually rolling at the place I go to.  So you're trying to apply techniques right off the bat and learning which ones work for you and which ones don't.  By the time you're allowed to spar in a traditional martial arts class, you've spent hundreds of hours drilling things that you may or may not be able to do successfully (and you're a year or two into a class without ever REALLY hitting anyone, or getting hit).
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 02, 2009, 11:04:14 PM
What I mean with MMA seperating the wheat from the chaff is that we've ended up with a very successful basic formula... Western boxing for hand techniques. A grappling system that takes whatever will work from BJJ, Catch as Can Wrestling, Folkstyle (high school and college freestyle), Grecko Roman, Judo, etc. And kicking techniques from Muay Thai.

This covers a huge amount of techniques and as you said an MMA practitioner has freedom to build a skill set that works with his own physical build, abilities, and mindset. Hell, if you're Chuck Liddell fuck the boxing and just go in there with some really good unorthodox karate stand up and a great take down defense built up through a lifetime of folkstyle wrestling. There is no wrong, there are only techniques that work or don't work and it's painfully obvious that most martial arts are packed to the gills with techniques that just don't work or are impractical.

BJJ has a LOT of techniques for submissions, but what you end up seeing over and over are the rear naked, the arm bar, and once in a while the kimura. BJJ looks down on leg submissions so you usually won't see a BJJ guy use one.

Leg submissions are a GREAT tool to have in your arsenal however, and that's why you'll see sambo and free style grapplers use them. Still, there are a lot of those too but what you'll see win a fight are the knee bar, heel hook, and Achillles tendon lock.

As Bruce Lee said, it's not the adding to, but the taking away. I think it's rather obvious that modern MMA is the true spirit of JKD, and I really feel sorry for those who believe that JKD is what Bruce taught to his students and that it would never have evolved beyond what he left behind.

I'm glad that you're training MMA. Krav Maga is a fucking lie.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 03, 2009, 12:49:26 AM
MMA is for sissy faygots.



















j/k mma is awesome.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 03, 2009, 01:19:27 AM
In my training I don't find as much pleasure in securing a submission as I do escaping one.

That said, a rolling kimura into top position is a favorite move of mine.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 03, 2009, 10:12:29 AM
In my training I don't find as much pleasure in securing a submission as I do escaping one.

That said, a rolling kimura into top position is a favorite move of mine.

Nice. Escapes are great, get one or two down really well and then bait your opponent into taking the technique! Arm bars were my favorite escape probably followed by triangle escapes.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 03, 2009, 05:03:13 PM
Yeah, around here in the local shows it's guillotine guillotine guillotine guillotine.

I swear the rubes would shit their pants if they saw this:

Rumina's Flying Armbar (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8_FevrLdaw#lq2-hq)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Doormouse on April 03, 2009, 05:22:12 PM
Except for the one day I was teaching my son the double leg take down and his sister fell on his face knee first. Now he's always like, "I don't want to do the double leg".
OK, but Loth... if Krsna's kids are injuring themselves on double leg takedowns, what makes you think they'll be doing any better with flying armbars?
Krsna you should just be teaching them the Muay Thai Clinch. It's a murderous set-up and I can't see your kids hurting themselves on this at all.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 03, 2009, 09:51:51 PM
Dude, he's four years old. Let the kid have some fun just fucking around!

Flying arm bars are wicked. They always make you all, "Oh no he di-ent!" when someone pulls one off.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 03, 2009, 10:09:22 PM
He's already too old.

You gots to be training them in the womb!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Doormouse on April 03, 2009, 10:10:50 PM
I miss TV... I was actually watching UFC when I broke the TV by hitting it too hard. It needed to be hit because there was a loose wire in it. The TV really sucked, but then when I hit it it died for good. So I tried to take the back off and I broker the stem of the picture tube. I was watching a match between some random dude and one of the fighters that I hate - I forget who. As always the fighter I hate was winning.

Who do you guys hate? My top 3 would probably be:
1)Urijah Faber - He's too much a pretty boy. Always wins and is too cocky.
2)Clay Guida - Because he fucking always wins. I've seen him lose exactly once. Other than that he's a decent guy. He was a real man about it when he lost the one time.
3)Georges St.Pierre - Because he's a whiny little bitch.

I'd love to see Faber go against Guida. They're totally within range. I'd root for Guida in a heartbeat, but I'd hope it was a really close match because I want to see both of them get the crap beaten out of them.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: FAH-Q on April 04, 2009, 03:09:02 PM
They Might Be Overrated

Not just "might". I've never understood what all the fuss is about with those guys.

Also, MMA is the shit. Kimbo Slice is my favourite! Kidding.

What did anyone think about the Couture/Lesnar fight?

And how is GSP a whiny little bitch? What am I missing?

Oh and that Bas Rutten video is great.

Another sentence for the hell of it.

And one more.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Doormouse on April 04, 2009, 03:36:04 PM
I don't know. I though GSP's reaction to losing to Matt Serra was pretty weak. The lead-up to the GSP-Matt Serra grudge-match turned me against him. If he'd lost a second time and had behaved more respectfully for a third fight I'd probably have rooted for him.

Also I think I've just had too much mixing with cocky Franco Quebecor dudes.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 04, 2009, 08:45:44 PM
Is the Iron Sheik still at it?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 04, 2009, 08:46:52 PM
He's on Howard Stern a lot ...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 04, 2009, 08:48:56 PM
I saw him in some kind of Japanese UFC thing getting his head handed to him a whiles back... probably old footage anyway... mid '90's, early '00's?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 04, 2009, 10:05:11 PM
Dude, the Iron Sheik is like 70. There was a radio show here in philly that had him on a couple of times, he's fucking crazy.

GSP is a frenchie frog douchebag. Take your losses like a man you asshole.

I've never seen Faber fight, but he seems pretty unlikeable.

The Couture / Lesnar fight didn't end the way I thought it did. I really thought Couture would win that, never even considered Lesnar knocking him out with a punch. In retrospect, sure. It's like getting hit by a locomotive. The UFC's heavyweight class spans 60 lbs. That's a huge difference.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 04, 2009, 10:09:28 PM
Lesnar's a MONSTER though ...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 04, 2009, 10:36:29 PM
Yeah, he's huge.

If the UFC is testing for steroids I can't see any way he could possibly test negative.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 04, 2009, 10:37:32 PM
Fuck yeah, which laboratory spat him out?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 04, 2009, 10:43:16 PM
The WWF/WWE ...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 04, 2009, 11:01:46 PM
Ahhh Dr McMahoninstein!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: FAH-Q on April 05, 2009, 11:04:04 AM
If the UFC is testing for steroids I can't see any way he could possibly test negative.

Seriously.

That fight was nuts though. The punch that knocked Couture out didn't even come close to connecting cleanly. I hate to think what a solid, clean strike from Lesnar would do to someone. Couple that with his serious wrestling skill and he's gonna be a problem for almost anyone.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 05, 2009, 11:48:38 AM
That's why their heavy weight class needs to be split. It spans 60 lbs! The others only span 15.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: FAH-Q on April 05, 2009, 01:22:54 PM
True, but are there enough super-heavyweights to make a weight class?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 06, 2009, 04:10:27 AM
Butterbean!

He's a class of his own!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: psychopathetic on April 06, 2009, 09:14:54 AM
Butterbean!

He's a class of his own!

that guys terrifies me. he is a serial ass rapist if i've ever seen one.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 06, 2009, 09:21:05 AM
True, but are there enough super-heavyweights to make a weight class?

Yeah, there aren't. I guess the solution is to cut off his roids and get him down to a reasonable weight.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: FAH-Q on April 06, 2009, 04:17:59 PM
It'd be pretty funny if he ended up looking something like Hans Moleman without the roids.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 06, 2009, 04:28:49 PM
I don't think he'd go that far, but I'd bet he'd drop at least 30 lbs of muscle.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 07, 2009, 05:36:37 AM
Quote
I hate to think what a solid, clean strike from Lesnar would do to someone.

Ask Heath Herring. First clean punch of the fight broke his orbital bone.

Randy had a shot in that fight. Lesnar grabbed the fence to stop Randy from taking him down, and who knows what could have happened there?

That's another pet peeve of mine. If grabbing the fence is illegal, then fucking do something about it other than shout "DON'T GRAB THE FENCE!" because it can seriously affect the outcome of a fight.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 07, 2009, 07:53:19 AM
I think after the first couple of dozen warnings they tell you you're going to lose a point if you grab the fence again.

As far as Lesnar goes, I'm not really a fan. The only thing he has to offer is size. Anybody can beat up someone smaller than them, and he looks like dick. He looks like a dickhead cop. 
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 07, 2009, 07:56:38 AM
Royce Gracie would pwn him...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 07, 2009, 08:04:07 AM
LOL, he would kick the shit out of Royce. Still, doesn't mean anything except he hyuge!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 07, 2009, 08:07:06 AM
I'm glad you got that...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: FAH-Q on April 07, 2009, 02:33:57 PM
He looks like a dickhead cop. 

Yeah, he really does.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Emperor Reagan on April 07, 2009, 06:36:39 PM
Yeah.  Lesnar definitely does look like a dickhead cop. 

I only watch his fights so I can cheer if he loses.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 07, 2009, 06:44:40 PM
I don't like Lesnar either. Sure, I respect that he wanted to test himself in real competition, but he's just a genetic freak. Being a genetic freak is not a skill.

Plus, he married Sable, who is the Jenna Jameson of pro wrestling.

That said, I don't know if Mir can pull off beating him twice. He got rocked early in the first fight and to be honest, Mazzagatti bailed him out. Mir did make Big Nog look like he'd never trained striking, though.

I love the way Lesnar can't pronounce "Mir." He always calls him "Murr."
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: FAH-Q on April 07, 2009, 07:14:53 PM
Plus, he married Sable, who is the Jenna Jameson of pro wrestling.

So he and Tito Ortiz should be buds, huh?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 08, 2009, 02:58:07 AM
I really wanna fuck Amanda Bynes ...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 08, 2009, 03:09:05 AM
(http://www.stevebroome.com/myspace/amanda-bynes.jpg)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: ttfg on April 08, 2009, 03:25:16 AM
ha, i was just going to post the exact same image.

mainly cause i had no idea who she was and google'd her.


i was going to add something about looking like a mum to my post.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 09, 2009, 02:04:20 AM
I've not seen that pic ...
Time to rethink this ...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 09, 2009, 09:17:34 AM
You know what would make her even hotter?

If all of her facial features were crammed even more closely into the center of her face.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 09, 2009, 09:19:36 AM
You know what would make her even hotter?

If all of her facial features were crammed even more closely into the center of her face.

I LOL'd.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: psychopathetic on April 09, 2009, 10:58:44 AM
You know what would make her even hotter?

If all of her facial features were crammed even more closely into the center of her face.

look, we can't help it, okay? we have fat faces and big cheekbones and it's JUST WHAT WE LOOK LIKE OKAY!?

we don't like it any more than you do.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 09, 2009, 11:00:53 AM
I'd rather fuck Sarah than Amanda Bynes......even with a baby hanging off each tit.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 09, 2009, 11:04:04 AM
Off your tits or yours?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 09, 2009, 11:04:43 AM
Doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 09, 2009, 11:07:07 AM
Doesn't matter.

Brilliant retort!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: psychopathetic on April 09, 2009, 11:08:07 AM
Doesn't matter.

you make me feel dirty.

like someone rubbed dirt on my heart.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 09, 2009, 11:09:11 AM
Is that good or bad?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 09, 2009, 11:20:24 AM
Doesn't matter.

you make me feel dirty.

like someone rubbed dirt on my heart.

The good kind of dirty?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 09, 2009, 11:37:14 AM
Yeah, that's the good kind.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 09, 2009, 01:10:17 PM
There isn't a bad kind. Dirty is good. Really dirty is better. Filthy is the best. Ashamed to go out in public after because you think people are looking at you and smelling you is plaid win.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 09, 2009, 01:13:09 PM
Ashamed to go out in public after because you think people are looking at you and smelling you is plaid win.

I always think that.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 09, 2009, 01:18:20 PM
Yes but people aren't looking at you and smelling you and thinking "This guy just finished anally fisting a Vietnamese hottie while throat fucking her as she explored his colon with a raw chicken leg. And her husband, parents and kids watched".

People are looking at you and smelling you and thinking "Meth is a hell of a drug".
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 09, 2009, 01:29:35 PM
True.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 09, 2009, 01:43:38 PM
(http://4gifs.com/gallery/d/56532-1/crack_meth.jpg)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: taiko on April 09, 2009, 06:20:32 PM
Off your tits or yours?

LOL
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: psychopathetic on April 09, 2009, 09:07:42 PM
Off your tits or yours?

LOL

or ours?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: taiko on April 09, 2009, 09:14:30 PM
Off your tits or yours?

LOL

or ours?

Off her tits, or hers?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: tricky on April 09, 2009, 11:52:34 PM
Yes but people aren't looking at you and smelling you and thinking "This guy just finished anally fisting a Vietnamese hottie while throat fucking her as she explored his colon with a raw chicken leg. And her husband, parents and kids watched".

People are looking at you and smelling you and thinking "Meth is a hell of a drug".

How YOU doin'?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 10, 2009, 05:30:56 PM
W3rd ...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 10, 2009, 09:43:56 PM
Yes but people aren't looking at you and smelling you and thinking "This guy just finished anally fisting a Vietnamese hottie while throat fucking her as she explored his colon with a raw chicken leg. And her husband, parents and kids watched".

People are looking at you and smelling you and thinking "Meth is a hell of a drug".

How YOU doin'?

Fuck me, I'm drunk.  At least suck me off, you won't get HPV that way.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 10, 2009, 09:45:19 PM
See? Meth really does make you think anything is possible.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 11, 2009, 02:00:02 AM
Not so fast (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090402092857.htm).
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 11, 2009, 09:10:06 AM
The human race is soooooo doomed.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 11, 2009, 10:28:16 AM
its been doomed since Elvis showed up...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 11, 2009, 10:41:42 AM
Elvis had HPV?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 11, 2009, 10:46:27 AM
well, he did die on the shitter... so maybe.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Zoomie on April 11, 2009, 10:50:26 AM
(http://www.marvinthemonkey.com/webJesus-Elvis.jpg)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: tricky on April 11, 2009, 12:16:59 PM
HPV will kill us all! Wooooo!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Drugmoth on April 11, 2009, 09:24:37 PM
It's the end of the world.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 11, 2009, 11:09:59 PM
Thanks Dylan Stipe.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 12, 2009, 04:05:03 AM
Wow, 70% of all people will have it by 2012 ...
Way to blend in with the average, man ...
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: taiko on April 12, 2009, 11:40:31 AM
It's the end of the world.

I don't know about you, but I feel fine.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: kc on April 12, 2009, 11:48:57 AM


THEN, Chuck Norris appears, and the ninjas and pirates flee in terror. Chuck then strides off into the sunset.

That would be awesome.

to get anally raped by van damm while segal does all the cool shit.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 12, 2009, 12:00:03 PM
Anyone see JCVD yet?

I'm tempted, because I'm told there's actual acting in it.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Doormouse on April 12, 2009, 12:23:07 PM
It's the end of the world.

I don't know about you, but I feel fine.
Nerd.  ;D
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: kc on April 12, 2009, 12:32:59 PM
Anyone see JCVD yet?

I'm tempted, because I'm told there's actual acting in it.

you lie!
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: mosh on April 12, 2009, 12:39:23 PM
I dont.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 13, 2009, 04:16:15 AM
Anyone see JCVD yet?

I'm tempted, because I'm told there's actual acting in it.

No, but here he is congratulating Fedor:

(http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w72/brooksb_photo/Yarennoka-FedorEmelianenkovsHong-Ma.gif)
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: (_)_)===D on April 13, 2009, 09:22:51 AM
What a homo.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on April 13, 2009, 06:03:17 PM
*waits for tricky to squirt*
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: tricky on April 13, 2009, 06:08:15 PM
?
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Lothar on April 13, 2009, 06:42:31 PM
You're into dudes humping.

Van Damme wants to hump Fedor.
Title: Re: Here's the difference.
Post by: Thrash on June 14, 2009, 04:44:58 PM
I really wanna fuck Amanda Bynes ...

Ok, try this link:
http://sexycelebs.grimpuppy.com/category/amanda-bynes/ (http://sexycelebs.grimpuppy.com/category/amanda-bynes/)