Loaded-Gun.Com - Anti-Social.Com's Rejects!
General Category => Politics, Philosophy, News and/or Current Affairs => Topic started by: underclass on August 24, 2009, 09:53:59 PM
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8217935.stm (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8217935.stm)
-
I love it when they say a certain waist size is fat without telling us how tall that person is allowed to be...
Apparently I'm really close to apple shaped, who knew...I always thought "apple" was more Rosanne Barr...
-
Wider seats for obese train passengers:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6080374/Wider-seats-for-obese-train-passengers.html?connect (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6080374/Wider-seats-for-obese-train-passengers.html?connect)
The seats are accompanied by signs picturing a rotund customer with the words "Priority chair for obese people".
They have been installed in response to the country's growing obesity problem, in an attempt to encourage larger people to use public transport.
But transport bosses say that they are being shunned by obese customers who are too ashamed to use them.
"It may be that they don't want to think of themselves as fat or they resent being put in with pensioners and the disabled," said one manager.
The picture is priceless.
-
That picture is rather awesome...they really need to put a giant sign behind it that says "SIT HERE, FATTY FAT FAT"
Why not just make all the chairs wide? Because then you can't point and laugh...
-
I love it when they say a certain waist size is fat without telling us how tall that person is allowed to be...
Apparently I'm really close to apple shaped, who knew...I always thought "apple" was more Rosanne Barr...
But they're not talking about weight here. They're talking solely about waist circumference. Therefore, height is irrelevant. It's all about where the fat accumulates.
-
I love it when they say a certain waist size is fat without telling us how tall that person is allowed to be...
Apparently I'm really close to apple shaped, who knew...I always thought "apple" was more Rosanne Barr...
But they're not talking about weight here. They're talking solely about waist circumference. Therefore, height is irrelevant. It's all about where the fat accumulates.
Height is relevant. A 5' woman and a 6' woman are going to have different waist sizes, but neither of them may be fat.
-
I love it when they say a certain waist size is fat without telling us how tall that person is allowed to be...
Apparently I'm really close to apple shaped, who knew...I always thought "apple" was more Rosanne Barr...
But they're not talking about weight here. They're talking solely about waist circumference. Therefore, height is irrelevant. It's all about where the fat accumulates.
Height is relevant. A 5' woman and a 6' woman are going to have different waist sizes, but neither of them may be fat.
What do you mean? You can have two women; one who's five feet tall, and another who's six feet tall. They can still both have a 40 inch waist size.
-
one of them is gonna get all the boys then
-
That's what happens when you give people fast food. You don't see any fat Nigerians, do you? Or Kenyans? They're our hunting giraffes. Not buying fucking baconators with onions and mustard. A little mustard. And large fries. And...
BRB.
-
What do you mean? You can have two women; one who's five feet tall, and another who's six feet tall. They can still both have a 40 inch waist size.
40" isn't relevant here, they are calling a woman with a 35" waist "apple shaped" which is ridiculous. Apple shaped women have a larger waist than hips and bust.
I have a 30" waist, and at 5'8" and 140lbs, I don't consider myself fat. If a 5' woman had my waist and overall weight, she'd be considered obese.
-
Basically, all women who are above 110lbs. should be shot and killed. Doesn't matter what their height is. Because... FAT WOMEN ARE ALL WORTHLESS AND SHOULD DIE! ALL THEY ARE GOOD FOR IS ZOOMIE'S COCK! And all skinny women are pretty much worthless too, except more men want to fuck them.
-
Oh look what I found!
http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/08/17/petas-new-ad-mocking-fat-women-as-whales-causes-anger/ (http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/08/17/petas-new-ad-mocking-fat-women-as-whales-causes-anger/)
So all you need to do to not be a fat worthless woman is be a vegetarian! Cuz, you know, chips and cheese pizza and french fries and bean burritos won't make you fat.
-
Basically, all women who are above 110lbs. should be shot and killed. Doesn't matter what their height is. Because... FAT WOMEN ARE ALL WORTHLESS AND SHOULD DIE! ALL THEY ARE GOOD FOR IS ZOOMIE'S COCK! And all skinny women are pretty much worthless too, except more men want to fuck them.
Can't have that ~ you need the fat women to do the "womanly work," freeing up the slender women for the fucking.
Wasn't that the entire basis of the Mormon religion???
-
Basically, all women who are above 110lbs. should be shot and killed. Doesn't matter what their height is. Because... FAT WOMEN ARE ALL WORTHLESS AND SHOULD DIE! ALL THEY ARE GOOD FOR IS ZOOMIE'S COCK! And all skinny women are pretty much worthless too, except more men want to fuck them.
Is it too late in our hate-hate relationship for me to tell you how much I really, really love you?
But you're not getting my butthole.
-
What do you mean? You can have two women; one who's five feet tall, and another who's six feet tall. They can still both have a 40 inch waist size.
40" isn't relevant here, they are calling a woman with a 35" waist "apple shaped" which is ridiculous. Apple shaped women have a larger waist than hips and bust.
I have a 30" waist, and at 5'8" and 140lbs, I don't consider myself fat. If a 5' woman had my waist and overall weight, she'd be considered obese.
So what is your point?
From the article:
A study suggests apple-shaped women with a waist bigger than 88cm (35in) have a higher risk of developing asthma - even if their body weight is normal.
So what is being argued here?
-
Just agree.
-
* nods
-
99% of these studies are retarded IMO. Like, why don't they link all the other shit in? Such as did they take into consideration if asthma is hereditary in each persons family? Does the person live in a highly-poluted area? Does the person have allergies? etc. They make it sound like if your waist is 35", you better loose a few inches so you don't get TEH ASSTHMAZ OMG.
-
My BMI is 20.8. I used to work with this woman who was 35 and hooked up to an oxygen tank that she carried around because her asthma was so bad. She was also obese, didn't exercise, smoked, and ate horribly (chicken pot pie and corn dogs for breakfast). She was apple shaped I guess you would say. I think that discrediting waist size and saying heredity is the only factor is just foolish. It makes sense that a fat person would have asthma.
-
I had asthma when I was a thin, athletic 14 year old. Luckily for me it went away. And the reason I had it was purely for the reasons I listed above.
-
The entire BMI concept has been around for 150 years and it's bullshit. It was invented by a Belgian for pissakes! A BELGIAN!!! WTF do they know about weight control with their sweets and their waffles...
-
So what is being argued here?
That I think it's a stupid, meaningless article and calling women fat who are not fat is a douche thing to do.
Why not write an article about how men with penises under 6 inches are at rick for developing assholitis, and that they have small dicks.
-
Why not write an article about how men with penises under 6 inches are at rick for developing assholitis, and that they have small dicks.
OMG, I fucking love you. You're the best thing to come out of this whole HF invasion!
-
Another thing that is retarded about the asthma study is, WHY IS IT DIRECTED ONLY AT WOMEN? If anyone has a logical answer for that one, I'd love to hear it.
Oh, I forgot. This is the reason.
FAT WOMEN ARE ALL WORTHLESS AND SHOULD DIE!
-
But you said my cock could have them! Unfair!
-
OMG, I fucking love you. You're the best thing to come out of this whole HF invasion!
haha *high five*
-
Another thing that is retarded about the asthma study is, WHY IS IT DIRECTED ONLY AT WOMEN? If anyone has a logical answer for that one, I'd love to hear it.
I think it is because men just don't want to point out any more inadequacies about themselves. I asked this guy, who keeps pestering me, how big his dick was and he wouldn't answer the question. I finally just ended the conversation by saying, "that small, huh?"
-
that's because normal blokes don't talk about that stuff. I've never had a conversation about dick-size with anyone not names Ricardo.
PS: ricardo was packin'
-
If a girl that you're trying to bang asks your dick size, tell her your dick size.
-
If a girl that you're trying to bang asks your dick size, tell her your dick size.
8 inches
-
Girls Boys never lie about their age dick size online. FACT.
-
8 is great.
then again, 9 is greater. i have a small and narrow down-there situation, and therefore surprised by my own size-ist nature. god i feel bad for guys with small dicks.
-
They also have to say if it is a baby arm or pencil thin. I have seen an 8 inch long dick the girth of a pencil and it is just sick.
Just had to chime in for that, I am leaving now.
-
in fact, an 8-incher with about the girth of a sharpie (ugh, kyle) was the worst deep dicking i never properly got a few years back. you shouldn't have sex with your friends. or with any dude with a pencil penis.
-
in fact, an 8-incher with about the girth of a sharpie (ugh, kyle) was the worst deep dicking i never properly got a few years back. you shouldn't have sex with asians. or with any dude with a pencil penis.
-
Just because I can.
(http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/6574/sharpievsdick.jpg)
-
Kyle, quit playing with your dick. Go outside and make some friends.
-
I can't find my micrometer.
-
GOOOOD! I knew he would post a pic after hip's comment. Why can I predict the future?! It is a curse!
-
I don't see why guys would lie about their dick size, eventually, it all comes out, anyway. Well, that's the goal.
-
GOOOOD!
Is that two extra O's or three? The latter, I hope.
-
I thought the exact same thing as Si. Get outta my head!
-
Who actually knows their dick size? And what does that mean: erect I take it? And measured from where: balls or where it meets the stomach?
For god's sake I have to take off my shoes and check inside to find out the foot size whenever I go bowling.
Imagine if a guy asked how deep you were.
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_penis_size#Measuring_the_penis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_penis_size#Measuring_the_penis)
Post your results!
-
How much do you trust these jokers?
Problems
A penis must be completely erect in order to obtain an accurate measurement. This may be difficult to achieve in a clinical setting. At least one Brazilian doctor resorted to injecting penises with drugs to induce erection, which gave more consistent results.[4] Some clinicians measure the penis by stretching the flaccid penis as far as comfortably possible.[5] Self-reported measurements tend to be unreliable because men often want to report a larger penis size.
i'm SHOCKED! Men would lie about their teeny-little-wienies? To make 'em sound like Humungo tallywackers??
Nah.
-
Length
The length can be measured with the subject standing and the penis held parallel to the floor. The penis is measured along the top, from the base to the tip. Results are inaccurate if the measurement is taken along the underside of the penis, or if the subject is seated or prone.[2]
I'm still not sure if this is supposed to be erect or flaccid. The "Girth" subsection clearly states that it needs to be erect, but it's notably missing from here. In the "Problems" section the article says that "a penis must be completely erect in order to obtain an accurate measurement," but then it goes on to describe different measurements made by "measur[ing] the penis by stretching the flaccid penis as far as comfortably possible." Apparently the average length seems to be between 5 and 6 inches. I'm finding it a bit hard to believe that's an erect measurement.
-
Length
The length can be measured with the subject standing and the penis held parallel to the floor. The penis is measured along the top, from the base to the tip. Results are inaccurate if the measurement is taken along the underside of the penis, or if the subject is seated or prone.[2]
I'm still not sure if this is supposed to be erect or flaccid. The "Girth" subsection clearly states that it needs to be erect, but it's notably missing from here. In the "Problems" section the article says that "a penis must be completely erect in order to obtain an accurate measurement," but then it goes on to describe different measurements made by "measur[ing] the penis by stretching the flaccid penis as far as comfortably possible." Apparently the average length seems to be between 5 and 6 inches. I'm finding it a bit hard to believe that's an erect measurement.
There's a section further down specifically about the studies. It indicates that it is an erect measurement. Even further down, they mention a particular study finding that the average flaccid length is 3.9". 8" is an average erect porn dick, according to one of the sources listed at the end of the wiki article.
They mention even later in the article that the most sensitive length of a female's genitalia is ~4" in length. Therefore, the median penis should be able to stimulate the most sensitive region of the female genitalia.
I think it absolutely makes sense that the average penis would be 5.1-5.9", since I don't there really is an evolutionary advantage to having a giant dick. I would actually bet on it being at the low end of the range, given that the studies they list that seem to have the smallest bias in sample or reporting are on the low end of the range.
-
Given these statistics you've uncovered regarding the most sensitive length of a female's genitalia, I suppose the 5-inch average would make sense if the point of evolution were to please the woman.
You'd think humans would be most similar to other animals where reproduction is the point, though. I'd think off-hand that the closer you can get the tip of the sperm-delivery-wand to the uterus the better your chances of fertilization would be especially given the probability of multiple partners with potentially more evolutionarily advanced johnsons.
Perhaps the wee willy is a byproduct of monogamy.
-
remember asia
-
Primates generally don't have big penises. Humans have the biggest penis of all primates, both in terms of absolute size and in terms of size relative to body (which I just noticed they also mention at the beginning of the wikipedia article). Whether it's monogamy, more generally the way primates organise themselves socially, or various other factors, there obviously has not been a strong correlation between larger cocks & evolutionary success for primate species.
I did read somewhere once some speculation that the shape of the penis head might've evolved to "shovel out" the competition's semen.
Also:
http://www.newscientist.com/articlevideo/dn17662/34860226001-human-sex-from-the-inside-out.html (http://www.newscientist.com/articlevideo/dn17662/34860226001-human-sex-from-the-inside-out.html)
-
Theres also something about male ejaculations being larger when with another mate.
No matter what you look at it, this is going to be a numbers game.
-
clearly the caveman with the biggest, most interestingly shaped dong got all the fertile bitches
-
Krsna you bastard...
-
He gets them all?
Isn't that going to make his girlfriend angry?
-
SO it's between Dylan and Kyle atm.
-
I did read somewhere once some speculation that the shape of the penis head might've evolved to "shovel out" the competition's semen.
I read that too. Also, has anyone else read the stuff about how certain sperm stick around and attack any rival sperm they encounter?
-
no, but DO elaborate...