Loaded-Gun.Com - Anti-Social.Com's Rejects!

General Category => Discontempt => Topic started by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 12:25:16 AM

Title: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 12:25:16 AM

A girly-man glides onto the ice in his little tutu outfit, right?

And then, he skates to THIS:

EQUILIBRIUM - Blut Im Auge (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yom8nNqmxvQ&feature=quicklist&playnext=14&playnext_from=QL#normal)

Mang, i wanna BE THERE!!!

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Thrash on December 12, 2009, 03:28:58 AM

No.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: mosh on December 12, 2009, 07:22:24 AM

You say No like you been there before.

You have been there before, havent you.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 07:56:27 AM

FUCK, THRASH!!!

Have  you actually DONE this???

i'm SOOOOOOOOO flippin' JEALOUS!!!

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 10:23:26 AM

I gained a real interest in death growls when I realized that the technique is a cousin of overtone singing.
Yes I am a nerd.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 10:29:50 AM

Quote from: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 10:23:26 AM

I gained a real interest in death growls when I realized that the technique is a cousin of overtone singing.
Yes I am a nerd.

EXPLAIN, please?

i'm a fucked up nerd.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 10:34:16 AM

It's all non-standard vocal-chord use.
Overtone singers create music using harmonic overtones rather than the way we normally use our vocal chords.
Death growlers use their false vocal folds.

The human voice is amazing.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 10:40:59 AM

No kidding.

i only have 1/2 of a voice ~ one vocal bit the dust,  ah, well

So i can't actually sing for more than about 30 mins

but i do use a gutteral hum for any melodies

i love music.  i always hear it, and if i could just ..

well, all anyway.

WoW.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 10:41:57 AM

See???

Do you SEE???

i STFU, withOUT blathering on for ever!





<~  oops.  broke arm patting self on back, AND big head doesn't QUITE fit through the freakin' door ...

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 10:43:27 AM

I don't mind blathering.
It gives me something to complain about.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 10:45:56 AM

Hey, dude!

You've gotta give me about 15 mins to EDIT before posting back ...


sheesh

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 10:47:56 AM

Y'all aren't exactly used to us Edit-ie folks, eh?

i have to LOOK at it.

It has to be just so.

It can't just be ANY way.

It's too stoopid, but it seems to be important to me.

What can i say?

To me, it's a canvas, and i get to paint on it with words,

but not just words ~ COLORS, different fonts, different SIZES

It's a game, and you put the pieces together so that it looks good,

to you.

i hate that about giving up on monkeying around with all that stuff.

It was fun.



p.s.  i forgive you, 'cuz Dear says i'm the ONLY "edit-ie" person he's ever met.

And the poor thang had to MARRY me to find this out!!!

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 10:59:47 AM

There's two sides to editing. I try to make it perfect the first go-round, but if I fucked something up then I have to undertake a weighing analysis. Post-facto editing makes you look like a cheat and a flip-flopper, but the alternative is to stand by your fucked up version. Does the benefit of striking the fucked up portion outweigh the rhetoric-weakening effects of the post-facto edit? Sometimes I just leave up mistakes like typos rather than weaken my argument.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Daddy on December 12, 2009, 11:02:38 AM

Quote from: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 12:25:16 AM

A girly-man glides onto the ice in his little tutu outfit, right?

And then, he skates to THIS:

EQUILIBRIUM - Blut Im Auge (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yom8nNqmxvQ&feature=quicklist&playnext=14&playnext_from=QL#normal)

Mang, i wanna BE THERE!!!

I play them on the show.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Nitya on December 12, 2009, 11:41:41 AM

Quote from: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 10:59:47 AM

There's two sides to editing. I try to make it perfect the first go-round, but if I fucked something up then I have to undertake a weighing analysis. Post-facto editing makes you look like a cheat and a flip-flopper, but the alternative is to stand by your fucked up version. Does the benefit of striking the fucked up portion outweigh the rhetoric-weakening effects of the post-facto edit? Sometimes I just leave up mistakes like typos rather than weaken my argument.

This is what I think sometimes, if I post something and then go back to edit it, sometimes it looks like i changed what i was saying rather than the typos. It bothered me a lot when I first got here cuz on HF if you dont write in why you edited you cant tell someone edited their post.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 11:49:08 AM

Cripes!

i always just went back and edited and edited,

not giving (nor actually KNOWING to give) a shit about what anyone thought i was doing.


For the most part, i figure, folks don't WANT to figure out what i'm thinking, at any given moment,

and so .

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 11:58:18 AM

I think that's normal. I'm the neurotic one.

EDIT: Good to know I'm not alone, though. :)

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 12:10:51 PM

Fuck you, pal!

MOI???  Neurotic?

i think NOT.






rofl

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 12:18:38 PM

Quote from: Thrash on December 02, 2009, 06:54:30 PM

*sigh*

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 12:24:59 PM

Man, i think i'm too dysfunctional to be neurotic.


i could be wrong ...




EDIT #1 = Nah!

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: FAH-Q on December 12, 2009, 06:57:56 PM

Quote from: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 10:59:47 AM

There's two sides to editing. I try to make it perfect the first go-round, but if I fucked something up then I have to undertake a weighing analysis. Post-facto editing makes you look like a cheat and a flip-flopper, but the alternative is to stand by your fucked up version. Does the benefit of striking the fucked up portion outweigh the rhetoric-weakening effects of the post-facto edit? Sometimes I just leave up mistakes like typos rather than weaken my argument.

This is why I like editing my posts in Entertainment better than any other forum.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 07:17:17 PM

Does it not mark them as edited? Mine are still marked as edited in the Drug forum.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: FAH-Q on December 12, 2009, 07:19:25 PM

Not if you delete and re-post.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 07:19:45 PM

Yeah, right.

You know, i almost made it through the first sentence

and for someone like ME to say you might be full of stuff?

DUDE.  You MIGHT be full of STUFF ...

just a thought

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: fyrenza on December 12, 2009, 07:22:17 PM

Quote from: FAH-Q on December 12, 2009, 06:57:56 PM

Quote from: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 10:59:47 AM

There's two sides to editing. I try to make it perfect the first go-round, but if I fucked something up then I have to undertake a weighing analysis. Post-facto editing makes you look like a cheat and a flip-flopper, but the alternative is to stand by your fucked up version. Does the benefit of striking the fucked up portion outweigh the rhetoric-weakening effects of the post-facto edit? Sometimes I just leave up mistakes like typos rather than weaken my argument.

This is why I like editing my posts in Entertainment better than any other forum.

i was like reading along,

and i didn't unfderstand why you didn't like EATING your posts!Q!!

Oh, man.  i think i might need to go to bed ...

WAIT!!!  i have FULL bottle of vods!!!

Poorest, poor y'all ...

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: Doormouse on December 12, 2009, 07:28:06 PM

Aaaaanyway....

Quote from: FAH-Q on December 12, 2009, 07:19:25 PM

Not if you delete and re-post.

Ah, now I get you. My problem is I don't want to look like I'm doing edits after someone replies to me, but sometimes I only see a typo after the response has been made or worst of all I see something stupid I said that the person didn't respond to and that I wish I could change now, but I'm locked into it now so rather than concede I obviously have to defend my stupid point to the death. Hehe. It does make the argument more fun in a way I suppose.

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: FAH-Q on December 12, 2009, 07:30:37 PM

Off topic, but this thread title makes me think of this:

The Muppet Movie Scene 2 WITH LYRICS (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmujQfO7MEw#normal)

Title: Re: Imagine THIS:
Post by: FAH-Q on December 12, 2009, 07:31:54 PM

Man, what an awesome movie that was.

"I dunno how to thank you guys!"

"I dunno WHY to thank you guys."