Loaded-Gun.Com - Anti-Social.Com's Rejects!

General Category => Politics, Philosophy, News and/or Current Affairs => Topic started by: Tru on December 19, 2012, 05:38:03 PM

Title: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on December 19, 2012, 05:38:03 PM: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20781625 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20781625)

Let me ask you all something. If I build a laser in my garage powerful enough to shoot this fucking military shit into useless space scrap would I be a terrorist? Why?
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Zoomie on December 19, 2012, 07:45:57 PM: Will you be wearing a ceramic lead-lined headpiece while you construct and fire said laser?
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on December 19, 2012, 08:28:09 PM: No it is cohesive, no extraneous radiation to worry about.

So a tin foil hat will not be required.

Now the maser, gotta watch out for reflections from small seems with that.
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Emperor Reagan on December 20, 2012, 10:03:31 AM: Terrorism is an arbitrary word used to describe violent acts by undesirables and foreigners.

So yes. From what you describe, you are not upper middle class so your act won't be blamed on access to weapons or mental illness. You are squarely in the "terrorist" category.
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on December 20, 2012, 10:15:11 AM: In who's book?
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Emperor Reagan on December 20, 2012, 10:16:27 AM: The media and government.

Who else defines people as terrorists?

Wait, also Skynet. Skynet would consider you a terrorist.
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on December 20, 2012, 10:27:21 AM: I'm doomed.
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Zoomie on December 20, 2012, 07:00:27 PM: Been a long time comin'...
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Thrash on December 21, 2012, 01:33:03 AM: Wow, is 12-21-12 the day Tru finally "gets it"?

This truly just may be the end of the world afterall!
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: beeyot on August 20, 2013, 11:01:54 PM: This+.50cal or a MK19?
DARPA Legged Squad Support System (LS3) Demonstrates New Capabilities (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40gECrmuCaU#)
and for the AI?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/29/quantum-computers-ai-artificial-intelligence-studies_n_3664011.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/29/quantum-computers-ai-artificial-intelligence-studies_n_3664011.html)
Have you seen this boy?
(http://wodumedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Edward-Furlong-John-Connor-stars-in-Lionsgate-Home-Entertainments-Terminator-2-Skynet-Edition-Blu-ray-5-960x1516.jpg)
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on September 22, 2013, 12:30:47 PM
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Emperor Reagan on September 22, 2013, 03:38:36 PM: We also can't really explain how a lot of things work with physics as we currently understand it. Good luck accurately mapping "all of the information since the big bang" when the working model is as flawed as what we've got.
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on September 22, 2013, 06:38:49 PM: Exactly, we know less than one tenth of one percent.
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Thrash on September 23, 2013, 02:18:21 AM: Less than that ...
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on September 23, 2013, 07:06:01 AM: It's strange to think about far away galaxies. Suppose we see a new star appear some million light years away. What we see as a new developing star is actually over 1,000,000 Years old. If you could instantly transport yourself you might find a dying dwarf star instead of the new star we perceive.

And what about even farther distances? Say a trillion light years away, there is no way we could ever see that place because there has not been enough time passed (that we know of) for light to ever travel that far.

I believe we can or will be able travel that far fairly easy, almost instantly some day.
Why, I don't know.
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on September 23, 2013, 07:17:31 AM: Ok this clears it up.

"Another perspective with equations offered in support:
The Universe is Cyclic with a cycle time of 16.5 billion years. The cycles repeat to give infinite age. The redshift is indicative of the Universe being in Gravitational equilibrium. The Gravitational Energy E=-mu/R + mcv, there is continuity between the centripetal acceleration g=v^2/R and the centrifugal acceleration cv/R cos(v). The redshift is the result of v^2/R=cv/R cos(v) thus v/c=cos(v)= sqrt(GM/Rc^2). Gravitational energy E=-mu/R + mcv is a quaternion energy consisting of a real energy -mu/R and the vector energy mcv. The real energy gives centripetal acceleraion and the vector energy gives the centrifugal (dark energy). Newton and Einstein did not include the vector energy in their gravity, though Einstein tried to add somethig to the same effect in his "Cosmological Constant. The Universe is finite in size R=158E24meters, Mass=2.133E53 kg and infinite in age, cycles of 16.5billion years. The shape of the universe is cuboctahedron.. "

LOL
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on September 23, 2013, 07:29:03 AM: Well this was interesting.

http://www.thescienceforum.com/astronomy-cosmology/31460-galaxy-trillion-light-years-away.html (http://www.thescienceforum.com/astronomy-cosmology/31460-galaxy-trillion-light-years-away.html)
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Tru on September 23, 2013, 07:48:14 AM: http://stephanwetaas.net/ (http://stephanwetaas.net/)
Title: Re: Skynet a reality
Post by: Maxillius on December 18, 2013, 11:52:18 PM: Quote from: Tru on December 19, 2012, 05:38:03 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20781625 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20781625)

Let me ask you all something. If I build a laser in my garage powerful enough to shoot this fucking military shit into useless space scrap would I be a terrorist? Why?

Yup, but Western governments have labelled people as "terrorist" for far less, if that makes you feel better.