Loaded-Gun.Com - Anti-Social.Com's Rejects!

This could be bad for the Gun... on: August 23, 2009, 04:20:23 AM

Quote

HR 1966... is meant to prevent people from using the Internet to "coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person."

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #1 on: August 23, 2009, 05:55:12 AM

"The New Freedom," commie style.

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #2 on: August 23, 2009, 06:11:58 AM

Meh, we move the board offshore... no biggie.

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #3 on: August 23, 2009, 06:13:52 AM

Of course it's a fucking ginger kid doing the trolling.

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #4 on: August 23, 2009, 07:50:15 AM

Meh, we move the board offshore... no biggie.

If the owner was Australian, that wouldnt work.

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #5 on: August 23, 2009, 09:53:27 AM

Move it to Antigua. Looks like we're all going there anyway.

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #6 on: August 23, 2009, 08:07:50 PM

Ah but no matter where you move to you still need a service provider.

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #7 on: August 23, 2009, 08:34:18 PM

Ah but no matter where you move to you still need a service provider.

bingo. it's not just a problem of where you do it, but how you get there too.

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #8 on: August 23, 2009, 10:23:18 PM

Note to self: coerce and harass people in person because it's harder to prove.

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #9 on: August 24, 2009, 01:37:22 AM

I do it all the time...

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #10 on: August 25, 2009, 04:55:35 AM

Quote from: Mosh on August 23, 2009, 06:11:58 AM
Meh, we move the board offshore... no biggie.

If the owner was Australian, that wouldnt work.

Luckily, I'm not the owner, and there are ways around that anyway...

Re: This could be bad for the Gun... Reply #11 on: August 25, 2009, 03:11:37 PM

That's fucking bullshit. Freedom of speech my ass.