×

Quote from: Drugmoth
I'm almost 25.  Young and supple and perfect for my fantasies with Zoomie.


Primer. I solved it.(Read 2402 times)
Primer. I solved it. on: November 06, 2009, 12:58:39 AM
So I've heard mention over the past couple years of this film called "Primer" that's supposed to be really good, but I never got a chance to watch it.  I think I even remember it being mentioned here a couple of times.  So then This recent XKCD comic reminded me of the movie, and since my roomate has a Netflix account, I looked it up and yes, it's on their streaming list.  So I watched it.

Then I said, "What the fuck?"

Then I watched it again.  Then I went insane.

Now, after two days of seclusion, diagrams, and insanity, I solved it.  This is the only solution I can see that makes sense.

The key to it all is when Aaron2, in the voiceover says, "The boxes are reusable".  What does he mean by this?  Of course the boxes are reusable.  After you've traveled and lived out the day, you turn it on again and reuse it.  Oh no, dear friend, it is much more frightening than that.  This is not a sci-fi movie, it's a horror film.

Imagine you have a box.  You turn it on, and you wait twelve hours, then turn it off and climb inside at the B point of the curve.  You then of course wait 12 more hours while traveling to the A point of the curve, then exit the box at the point at which you originally turned it on.  That's how it works, right?  Abe explained this to Aaron simply.  But he didn't realize something.  the box is reusable.  What happens if, after making this first 12-hour trip backwards, you wait eleven hours, and then turn off the box and climb in?

The box is fucking reusable.

I now present to you the accurate, and only logical, timeline of "Primer":





You may go insane now.


Edit:  Hmm, I guess either something about making it in MsPaint or my state of mind right now, but I can't make it show larger.  You may have to copy the image locationa nd open it in a new window to read.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 01:09:09 AM by Phaedrus »
No one mourns the wicked.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #1 on: November 06, 2009, 01:06:44 AM
<blink> 

<blink blink>

...


gonna have to see that!
(from bash.org) <Twig> I just had an argument with a girl I know. She was saying how it's unfair that if a guy fucks a different girl every week, he's a legend, but if a girl fucks just two guys in a year, she's a slut. So in response I told her that if a key opens lots of locks, then it's a master key. But if a lock is opened by lots of keys, then it's a shitty lock. That shut her up.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #2 on: November 06, 2009, 01:29:50 AM
This is why you only put women and children in boxes.

edit: Nice work.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 01:34:12 AM by banal »
Quote from: FB comment
Look dude, there's only one thing I like that starts with Hot Black Co- and it doesn't end in 'ffee'.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #3 on: November 06, 2009, 06:49:49 AM
My brother and I object to the use of our names and characters and intend to sue the makers of this movie.

Also movies that ignore the universal law of paradox suck.
No Nyarlathotep, no chaos...
KNOW NYARLATHOTEP, KNOW CHAOS!



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #4 on: November 08, 2009, 08:54:37 PM
Zoomie:  It covers paradox pretty well, actually.  I can't spoil the end, but it's the paradox that forces them to start over.

Fuse:  "The boxes are not one-use only."  It's not that he's turning the boxes on and off, it's that he's carries back another box with him, and sets that one up for use.  It's their modular nature.

Mosh:  You watched this!
Like yours.  Only different.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #5 on: November 09, 2009, 03:37:44 AM
Zoomie:  It covers paradox pretty well, actually.  I can't spoil the end, but it's the paradox that forces them to start over.

Fuse:  "The boxes are not one-use only."  It's not that he's turning the boxes on and off, it's that he's carries back another box with him, and sets that one up for use.  It's their modular nature.

Mosh:  You watched this!

Wrong.  What's he referring to is when Abe told him in the beginning that the boxes were one use only -per trip.  In that scene, he's talking about why they have to seclude themselves in the hotel before using the boxes: because you can't go back again, but Abe didn't realize that you CAN actually use the box again if you go back to the box and turn it off again earlier than you did the first time, creating a new B point and thereby erasing (or consuming, really) your former self that got in the box the first time.

Or doing this to someone else, like Aaron does to Abe, severing his original B point and untethering him.  It's the only way the movie works.  If Aaron found the box and went back before the Granger incident, then when Abe went to use the failsafe, it would already be turned off.  It's the same vice-versa, if he discovered it after the Granger incident and tried to use it,  the failsafe would already be turned off from Abe using it.  It only adds up if Aaron didn't find the failsafe until after Abe's attempt at a rewrite.  It's the only way they can both have used the failsafe.  One scene even back this up:  the scene at the gas station when Aaron says, "What's worse, thinking you're paranoid or knowing you SHOULD be?"  He's realized that something's not adding up.  That Abe has already come back and is trying to affect events from the sidelines.  the scene at the bench showing Abe looking at Aaron from the roof:  He doesn't go down to speak to Aaron from there, that's Abe2 watching the conversation after he's come back.

Now, the recursive loop is a little shaky, but it's the only thing I can figure out about how Aaron worked ther party.  He was already untethered when he drugged his previous-self's milk, anyway.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 12:36:07 AM by Phaedrus »
No one mourns the wicked.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #6 on: November 09, 2009, 03:49:15 AM
Edit:  Hmm, accidentally hit "quote" instead of "edit" the first time, apparently
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 12:36:50 AM by Phaedrus »
No one mourns the wicked.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #7 on: November 10, 2009, 07:35:02 AM
Indeed I did.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #8 on: November 10, 2009, 08:12:51 AM
reading this thread was faster than watching the film, cheers
Loaded-Gun.com - I don't know what the hell they are talking about or why they are even there. They don't make serious points and they don't joke, but they still manage to make a lot of posts somehow.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #9 on: November 14, 2009, 04:30:19 AM
Ummm............my brain asplode. 

When it comes to movies, I love "thinkers"....I just don't like movies that make me think so hard my brain says "fuck you" and walks away.  I think the movie Adaptation represents the extent of depth I like a flick to have.  Extremely clever and brilliant Adaptation was.  Yoda, I am.
~
A pleasant man with a pleasant weapon



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #10 on: November 18, 2009, 01:14:52 PM
Agreeing, I find myself.
Adaptation was sweetness.



Re: Primer. I solved it. Reply #11 on: November 29, 2009, 06:33:39 PM
Partout!
Like yours.  Only different.